Showing 45 of 45 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct(array $params)
{
if ($invalidConfigParams = array_diff_key($params, self::$defaultParams)) {
throw new TestingException(
'The following elements are not valid AMQP configuration params: ' . json_encode($invalidConfigParams)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct(array $params)
{
if ($invalidConfigParams = array_diff_key($params, self::$defaultParams)) {
throw new TestingException(
'The following elements are not valid PDO configuration params: ' . json_encode($invalidConfigParams)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 179.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
The class RabbitMQService has 13 public methods. Consider refactoring RabbitMQService to keep number of public methods under 10. Open
class RabbitMQService implements AMQPService
{
/**
* @var AMQPConnection
*/
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
TooManyPublicMethods
Since: 0.1
A class with too many public methods is probably a good suspect for refactoring, in order to reduce its complexity and find a way to have more fine grained objects.
By default it ignores methods starting with 'get' or 'set'.
Example
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#toomanypublicmethods
Avoid excessively long variable names like $configurationFileName. Keep variable name length under 20. Open
public function __construct(string $configurationFileName = '', $fileSystem = null)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
LongVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, formal or local variable is declared with a long name.
Example
class Something {
protected $reallyLongIntName = -3; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $interestingArgumentsList[] ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$otherReallyLongName = -5; // VIOLATION - Local
for ($interestingIntIndex = 0; // VIOLATION - For
$interestingIntIndex < 10;
$interestingIntIndex++ ) {
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#longvariable
Method create
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
string $host,
int $port,
string $user,
string $password,
string $vHost = '/',
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isset($params[self::AMQP_KEY])) {
if ($invalidConfigParams = array_diff_key($params[self::AMQP_KEY], self::$defaultAMQPParams)) {
throw new TestingException(
'The following elements are not valid AMQP configuration params: ' . json_encode($invalidConfigParams)
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isset($params[self::PDO_KEY])) {
if ($invalidConfigParams = array_diff_key($params[self::PDO_KEY], self::$defaultPDOParams)) {
throw new TestingException(
'The following elements are not valid PDO configuration params: ' . json_encode($invalidConfigParams)
);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method publishMessage
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function publishMessage(AMQPChannel $channel, string $body, array $properties, string $exchange, string $routingKey): void;
Method consumeMessage
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function consumeMessage(AMQPChannel $channel, string $consumerTag, string $queue, callable $callback, int $timeout = 0): void
Method publishMessage
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function publishMessage(AMQPChannel $channel, string $body, array $properties, string $exchange, string $routingKey): void
Function __construct
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct(array $params)
{
if (empty($params)) {
throw new TestingException('Configuration parameters are empty');
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __construct
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct(array $params)
{
if ($invalidConfigParams = array_diff_key($params, self::$defaultParams)) {
throw new TestingException(
'The following elements are not valid PDO configuration params: ' . json_encode($invalidConfigParams)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __construct
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct(array $params)
{
if ($invalidConfigParams = array_diff_key($params, self::$defaultParams)) {
throw new TestingException(
'The following elements are not valid AMQP configuration params: ' . json_encode($invalidConfigParams)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Missing class import via use statement (line '37', column '37'). Open
$this->fixtureLoaders = new \SplObjectStorage();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#MissingImport
Missing class import via use statement (line '74', column '25'). Open
$elements = new \ArrayIterator();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#MissingImport
Missing class import via use statement (line '93', column '20'). Open
return new \ArrayIterator($this->params[self::AFTER_LAST_TEST_KEY][self::PURGE_QUEUES_KEY]);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#MissingImport
Missing class import via use statement (line '88', column '20'). Open
return new \ArrayIterator($this->params[self::AFTER_TEST_KEY][self::PURGE_QUEUES_KEY]);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#MissingImport
Missing class import via use statement (line '69', column '20'). Open
return new \ArrayIterator($this->params[self::BEFORE_FIRST_TEST_KEY][self::PURGE_QUEUES_KEY]);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}
Source http://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#MissingImport
The method create has a boolean flag argument $insist, which is a certain sign of a Single Responsibility Principle violation. Open
bool $insist = false,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
BooleanArgumentFlag
Since: 1.4.0
A boolean flag argument is a reliable indicator for a violation of the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). You can fix this problem by extracting the logic in the boolean flag into its own class or method.
Example
class Foo {
public function bar($flag = true) {
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#booleanargumentflag
Missing class import via use statement (line '83', column '20'). Open
return new \ArrayIterator($this->params[self::BEFORE_TEST_KEY][self::PURGE_QUEUES_KEY]);
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
MissingImport
Since: 2.7.0
Importing all external classes in a file through use statements makes them clearly visible.
Example
function make() {
return new \stdClass();
}