Showing 6 of 6 total issues
Class TableDefinition has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TableDefinition
#
# C* Data Types. See http://www.datastax.com/documentation/cql/3.0/cql/cql_reference/cql_data_types_c.html
#Method select has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select(table, options={})
query_string = "SELECT #{options[:projection] || '*'} FROM #{table}"
options[:secondary_options] ||= {}
if options[:selection]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method select has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select(table, options={})
query_string = "SELECT #{options[:projection] || '*'} FROM #{table}"
options[:secondary_options] ||= {}
if options[:selection]Method to_cql_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_cql_value(column, value, table, options={})
operator = options[:operations] ? options[:operations][column.to_sym] : nil
operation = operator ? "#{column} #{operator} " : ''
if value.respond_to?(:strftime)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method map has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def map(column_name, options={})
key_type, value_type = options[:key_type], options[:value_type]
[key_type, value_type].each_with_index do |type, index|
if type.nil?
raise Errors::MigrationDefinitionError, "A map must define a #{index = 0 ? 'key' : 'value'} type."- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method column_type_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def column_type_for(type, options={})
cql_type = type if PASSTHROUGH_TYPES.include?(type)
cql_type ||= TYPES_MAP[type]
if PRECISION_MAP.keys.include?(type)
limit = options[:limit]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"