ikuseiGmbH/smart-village-app-cms

View on GitHub
app/controllers/noticeboards_controller.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage

Method has too many lines. [41/10]
Open

  def index
    @noticeboard_name = noticeboard_params[:name] || "Schwarzes Brett"
    category_ids = noticeboard_params[:category_ids]

    results = @smart_village.query <<~GRAPHQL

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Method has too many lines. [18/10]
Open

  def destroy
    results = @smart_village.query <<~GRAPHQL
      mutation {
        destroyRecord(
          id: #{params["id"]},

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Method index has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def index
    @noticeboard_name = noticeboard_params[:name] || "Schwarzes Brett"
    category_ids = noticeboard_params[:category_ids]

    results = @smart_village.query <<~GRAPHQL
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/noticeboards_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    NoticeboardsController has no descriptive comment
    Open

    class NoticeboardsController < ApplicationController

    Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.

    Example

    Given

    class Dummy
      # Do things...
    end

    Reek would emit the following warning:

    test.rb -- 1 warning:
      [1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)

    Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:

    # The Dummy class is responsible for ...
    class Dummy
      # Do things...
    end

    NoticeboardsController assumes too much for instance variable '@smart_village'
    Open

    class NoticeboardsController < ApplicationController

    Classes should not assume that instance variables are set or present outside of the current class definition.

    Good:

    class Foo
      def initialize
        @bar = :foo
      end
    
      def foo?
        @bar == :foo
      end
    end

    Good as well:

    class Foo
      def foo?
        bar == :foo
      end
    
      def bar
        @bar ||= :foo
      end
    end

    Bad:

    class Foo
      def go_foo!
        @bar = :foo
      end
    
      def foo?
        @bar == :foo
      end
    end

    Example

    Running Reek on:

    class Dummy
      def test
        @ivar
      end
    end

    would report:

    [1]:InstanceVariableAssumption: Dummy assumes too much for instance variable @ivar

    Note that this example would trigger this smell warning as well:

    class Parent
      def initialize(omg)
        @omg = omg
      end
    end
    
    class Child < Parent
      def foo
        @omg
      end
    end

    The way to address the smell warning is that you should create an attr_reader to use @omg in the subclass and not access @omg directly like this:

    class Parent
      attr_reader :omg
    
      def initialize(omg)
        @omg = omg
      end
    end
    
    class Child < Parent
      def foo
        omg
      end
    end

    Directly accessing instance variables is considered a smell because it breaks encapsulation and makes it harder to reason about code.

    If you don't want to expose those methods as public API just make them private like this:

    class Parent
      def initialize(omg)
        @omg = omg
      end
    
      private
      attr_reader :omg
    end
    
    class Child < Parent
      def foo
        omg
      end
    end

    Current Support in Reek

    An instance variable must:

    • be set in the constructor
    • or be accessed through a method with lazy initialization / memoization.

    If not, Instance Variable Assumption will be reported.

    Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def destroy
        results = @smart_village.query <<~GRAPHQL
          mutation {
            destroyRecord(
              id: #{params["id"]},
    Severity: Major
    Found in app/controllers/noticeboards_controller.rb and 5 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
    app/controllers/deadlines_controller.rb on lines 135..154
    app/controllers/defect_reports_controller.rb on lines 55..74
    app/controllers/static_contents_controller.rb on lines 74..93
    app/controllers/surveys_controller.rb on lines 78..97
    app/controllers/tours_controller.rb on lines 179..198

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 32.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Missing top-level class documentation comment.
    Open

    class NoticeboardsController < ApplicationController

    This cop checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, or constant definitions.

    The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.

    Example:

    # bad
    class Person
      # ...
    end
    
    # good
    # Description/Explanation of Person class
    class Person
      # ...
    end

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status