ikuseiGmbH/smart-village-app-cms

View on GitHub
app/helpers/form_helper.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
0 mins
Test Coverage

Assignment Branch Condition size for lunch_empty? is too high. [19/15]
Wontfix

  def lunch_empty?(object)
    return false if object.text.present?

    if object.dates.present?
      date = object.dates.first
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_Software_Metric.

Cyclomatic complexity for lunch_empty? is too high. [7/6]
Wontfix

  def lunch_empty?(object)
    return false if object.text.present?

    if object.dates.present?
      date = object.dates.first
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

FormHelper#lunch_empty? refers to 'object' more than self (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

    return false if object.text.present?

    if object.dates.present?
      date = object.dates.first

Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

Feature Envy occurs when a code fragment references another object more often than it references itself, or when several clients do the same series of manipulations on a particular type of object.

Feature Envy reduces the code's ability to communicate intent: code that "belongs" on one class but which is located in another can be hard to find, and may upset the "System of Names" in the host class.

Feature Envy also affects the design's flexibility: A code fragment that is in the wrong class creates couplings that may not be natural within the application's domain, and creates a loss of cohesion in the unwilling host class.

Feature Envy often arises because it must manipulate other objects (usually its arguments) to get them into a useful form, and one force preventing them (the arguments) doing this themselves is that the common knowledge lives outside the arguments, or the arguments are of too basic a type to justify extending that type. Therefore there must be something which 'knows' about the contents or purposes of the arguments. That thing would have to be more than just a basic type, because the basic types are either containers which don't know about their contents, or they are single objects which can't capture their relationship with their fellows of the same type. So, this thing with the extra knowledge should be reified into a class, and the utility method will most likely belong there.

Example

Running Reek on:

class Warehouse
  def sale_price(item)
    (item.price - item.rebate) * @vat
  end
end

would report:

Warehouse#total_price refers to item more than self (FeatureEnvy)

since this:

(item.price - item.rebate)

belongs to the Item class, not the Warehouse.

FormHelper#lunch_empty? has approx 6 statements
Wontfix

  def lunch_empty?(object)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

A method with Too Many Statements is any method that has a large number of lines.

Too Many Statements warns about any method that has more than 5 statements. Reek's smell detector for Too Many Statements counts +1 for every simple statement in a method and +1 for every statement within a control structure (if, else, case, when, for, while, until, begin, rescue) but it doesn't count the control structure itself.

So the following method would score +6 in Reek's statement-counting algorithm:

def parse(arg, argv, &error)
  if !(val = arg) and (argv.empty? or /\A-/ =~ (val = argv[0]))
    return nil, block, nil                                         # +1
  end
  opt = (val = parse_arg(val, &error))[1]                          # +2
  val = conv_arg(*val)                                             # +3
  if opt and !arg
    argv.shift                                                     # +4
  else
    val[0] = nil                                                   # +5
  end
  val                                                              # +6
end

(You might argue that the two assigments within the first @if@ should count as statements, and that perhaps the nested assignment should count as +2.)

Complex method FormHelper#lunch_empty? (23.8)
Wontfix

  def lunch_empty?(object)
    return false if object.text.present?

    if object.dates.present?
      date = object.dates.first
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by flog

Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.

You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool

Method lunch_empty? has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Wontfix

  def lunch_empty?(object)
    return false if object.text.present?

    if object.dates.present?
      date = object.dates.first
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

FormHelper#lunch_empty? calls 'object.dates' 2 times
Open

    if object.dates.present?
      date = object.dates.first
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

FormHelper has no descriptive comment
Open

module FormHelper
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

Classes and modules are the units of reuse and release. It is therefore considered good practice to annotate every class and module with a brief comment outlining its responsibilities.

Example

Given

class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

Reek would emit the following warning:

test.rb -- 1 warning:
  [1]:Dummy has no descriptive comment (IrresponsibleModule)

Fixing this is simple - just an explaining comment:

# The Dummy class is responsible for ...
class Dummy
  # Do things...
end

FormHelper#lunch_empty? calls 'object.lunch_offers' 2 times
Open

    return false if object.lunch_offers.present? && object.lunch_offers.any?
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

Duplication occurs when two fragments of code look nearly identical, or when two fragments of code have nearly identical effects at some conceptual level.

Reek implements a check for Duplicate Method Call.

Example

Here's a very much simplified and contrived example. The following method will report a warning:

def double_thing()
  @other.thing + @other.thing
end

One quick approach to silence Reek would be to refactor the code thus:

def double_thing()
  thing = @other.thing
  thing + thing
end

A slightly different approach would be to replace all calls of double_thing by calls to @other.double_thing:

class Other
  def double_thing()
    thing + thing
  end
end

The approach you take will depend on balancing other factors in your code.

FormHelper#empty? doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Open

  def empty?(object, fields)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

FormHelper#lunch_point_of_interest_attribute_checked? doesn't depend on instance state (maybe move it to another class?)
Wontfix

  def lunch_point_of_interest_attribute_checked?(record, attribute)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by reek

A Utility Function is any instance method that has no dependency on the state of the instance.

Missing top-level module documentation comment.
Open

module FormHelper
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, or constant definitions.

The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.

Example:

# bad
class Person
  # ...
end

# good
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
  # ...
end

Missing magic comment # frozen_string_literal: true.
Open

module FormHelper
Severity: Minor
Found in app/helpers/form_helper.rb by rubocop

This cop is designed to help upgrade to after Ruby 3.0. It will add the comment # frozen_string_literal: true to the top of files to enable frozen string literals. Frozen string literals may be default after Ruby 3.0. The comment will be added below a shebang and encoding comment. The frozen string literal comment is only valid in Ruby 2.3+.

Example: EnforcedStyle: always (default)

# The `always` style will always add the frozen string literal comment
# to a file, regardless of the Ruby version or if `freeze` or `<<` are
# called on a string literal.
# bad
module Bar
  # ...
end

# good
# frozen_string_literal: true

module Bar
  # ...
end

Example: EnforcedStyle: never

# The `never` will enforce that the frozen string literal comment does
# not exist in a file.
# bad
# frozen_string_literal: true

module Baz
  # ...
end

# good
module Baz
  # ...
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status