Showing 17 of 17 total issues
File FABridge.js
has 477 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
/*
Copyright 2006 Adobe Systems Incorporated
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
Function FABridge__bridgeInitialized
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function FABridge__bridgeInitialized(bridgeName) {
var objects = document.getElementsByTagName("object");
var ol = objects.length;
var activeObjects = [];
if (ol > 0) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
prototype
has 23 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
{
// bootstrapping
Function FABridge__bridgeInitialized
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function FABridge__bridgeInitialized(bridgeName) {
var objects = document.getElementsByTagName("object");
var ol = objects.length;
var activeObjects = [];
if (ol > 0) {
File web_socket.js
has 262 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// Copyright: Hiroshi Ichikawa <http://gimite.net/en/>
// License: New BSD License
// Reference: http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/
// Reference: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hixie-thewebsocketprotocol
Function __createFlash
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
WebSocket.prototype.__createFlash = function(url, protocol, proxyHost, proxyPort, headers) {
var self = this;
self.__flash =
WebSocket.__flash.create(url, protocol, proxyHost || null, proxyPort || 0, headers || null);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (ol > 0) {
for (var i = 0; i < ol; i++) {
if (typeof objects[i].SetVariable != "undefined") {
activeObjects[activeObjects.length] = objects[i];
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (el > 0) {
for (var j = 0; j < el; j++) {
if (typeof embeds[j].SetVariable != "undefined") {
activeEmbeds[activeEmbeds.length] = embeds[j];
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function deserialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserialize: function(packedValue)
{
var result;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function deserialize
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deserialize: function(packedValue)
{
var result;
Function __initialize
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
WebSocket.__initialize = function() {
if (WebSocket.__swfLocation) {
// For backword compatibility.
window.WEB_SOCKET_SWF_LOCATION = WebSocket.__swfLocation;
}
Function serialize
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serialize: function(value)
{
var result = {};
var t = typeof(value);
Function serialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
serialize: function(value)
{
var result = {};
var t = typeof(value);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < packedValue.length; i++)
{
result[i] = this.deserialize(packedValue[i]);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var i = 0; i < value.length; i++)
{
result[i] = this.serialize(value[i]);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (param.nodeType == 1 && param.tagName.toLowerCase() == "param" && param["name"].toLowerCase() == "flashvars" && param["value"].indexOf(searchStr) >= 0) {
FABridge.attachBridge(activeObjects[k], bridgeName);
flash_found = true;
break;
}
Function __createFlash
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
WebSocket.prototype.__createFlash = function(url, protocol, proxyHost, proxyPort, headers) {