Showing 114 of 114 total issues
BatchOptions
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public final class BatchOptions implements Cloneable {
// default values here are consistent with Telegraf
public static final int DEFAULT_BATCH_ACTIONS_LIMIT = 1000;
public static final int DEFAULT_BATCH_INTERVAL_DURATION = 1000;
BatchPoints
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class BatchPoints {
private String database;
private String retentionPolicy;
private Map<String, String> tags;
private List<Point> points;
Method buildQueryString
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public StringBuilder buildQueryString(final StringBuilder builder) {
builder.append("SELECT ");
if (isDistinct) {
Method appendName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static StringBuilder appendName(final Object name, final StringBuilder stringBuilder) {
if (name instanceof String) {
appendName((String) name, stringBuilder);
} else if (name instanceof Column) {
appendName(((Column) name).getName(), stringBuilder);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method setField
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void setField(
final Class<?> fieldType,
final String columnName,
final Object value) {
if (boolean.class.isAssignableFrom(fieldType) || Boolean.class.isAssignableFrom(fieldType)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
void write() {
List<Point> currentBatch = null;
try {
if (this.queue.isEmpty()) {
BatchProcessor.this.batchWriter.write(Collections.emptyList());
Method concatenatedFields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private int concatenatedFields(final StringBuilder sb) {
int fieldCount = 0;
for (Entry<String, Object> field : this.fields.entrySet()) {
Object value = field.getValue();
if (value == null || isNotFinite(value)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method adaptValue
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static Object adaptValue(final Class<?> fieldType, final Object value, final TimeUnit precision,
final String fieldName, final String className) {
try {
if (String.class.isAssignableFrom(fieldType)) {
return String.valueOf(value);
Method equals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("checkstyle:needbraces")
@Override
public boolean equals(final Object obj) {
if (this == obj)
return true;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method addFieldsFromPOJO
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Builder addFieldsFromPOJO(final Object pojo) {
Class<?> clazz = pojo.getClass();
Measurement measurement = clazz.getAnnotation(Measurement.class);
boolean allFields = measurement != null && measurement.allFields();
Method addFieldByAttribute
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void addFieldByAttribute(final Object pojo, final Field field, final boolean tag,
final String fieldName, final TypeMapper typeMapper) {
try {
Object fieldValue = field.get(pojo);
Method appendValue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static StringBuilder appendValue(final Object value, final StringBuilder stringBuilder) {
if (value instanceof Appendable) {
Appendable appendable = (Appendable) value;
appendable.appendTo(stringBuilder);
} else if (value instanceof Function) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public synchronized void write(final Collection<BatchPoints> collection) {
// empty the cached data first
ListIterator<BatchPoints> batchQueueIterator = batchQueue.listIterator();
while (batchQueueIterator.hasNext()) {
Method cacheMeasurementClass
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
void cacheMeasurementClass(final Class<?>... classVarAgrs) {
for (Class<?> clazz : classVarAgrs) {
if (CLASS_INFO_CACHE.containsKey(clazz.getName())) {
continue;
}
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (name instanceof Function) {
Function functionCall = (Function) name;
stringBuilder.append(functionCall.getName()).append('(');
for (int i = 0; i < functionCall.getParameters().length; i++) {
if (i > 0) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else if (value instanceof Function) {
Function functionCall = (Function) value;
stringBuilder.append(functionCall.getName()).append('(');
for (int i = 0; i < functionCall.getParameters().length; i++) {
if (i > 0) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method formatedTime
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void formatedTime(final StringBuilder sb, final TimeUnit precision) {
if (this.time == null) {
return;
}
TimeUnit converterPrecision = precision;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parseSeriesAs
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<T> List<T> parseSeriesAs(final QueryResult.Series series, final Class<T> clazz, final List<T> result,
final TimeUnit precision) {
int columnSize = series.getColumns().size();
ClassInfo classInfo = CLASS_INFO_CACHE.get(clazz.getName());
Method formatedTime
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void formatedTime(final StringBuilder sb, final TimeUnit precision) {
if (this.time == null) {
return;
}
TimeUnit converterPrecision = precision;
Method query
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void query(final Query query, final Consumer<QueryResult> onSuccess, final Consumer<Throwable> onFailure) {
final Call<QueryResult> call = callQuery(query);
call.enqueue(new Callback<QueryResult>() {
@Override