Possible SQL injection Open
where("#{attribute_alias(:outzone_time)} < ?", Time.zone.now)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Class Domain
has 97 methods (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Domain < ApplicationRecord
include UserEvents
include Roids
include Versions # version/domain_version.rb
include Domain::Expirable
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
File domain.rb
has 637 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Domain < ApplicationRecord
include UserEvents
include Roids
include Versions # version/domain_version.rb
include Domain::Expirable
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method manage_automatic_statuses
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def manage_automatic_statuses
unless self.class.nameserver_required?
deactivate if nameservers.reject(&:marked_for_destruction?).empty?
activate if nameservers.reject(&:marked_for_destruction?).size >= Setting.ns_min_count
end
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method admin_status_update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def admin_status_update(update)
return unless update
PaperTrail.request(enabled: false) do
update_unless_locked_by_registrant(update)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_nameserver_ips
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_nameserver_ips
nameservers.to_a.reject(&:marked_for_destruction?).each do |ns|
next unless ns.hostname.end_with?(".#{name}")
next if ns.ipv4.present? || ns.ipv6.present?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method registrant_update_confirmable?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def registrant_update_confirmable?(token)
return false if statuses.include? DomainStatus::DELETE_CANDIDATE
return false unless pending_update?
return false unless registrant_verification_asked?
return false unless registrant_verification_token == token
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method registrant_delete_confirmable?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def registrant_delete_confirmable?(token)
return false unless pending_delete?
return false unless registrant_verification_asked?
return false unless registrant_verification_token == token
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"