Method listMessages
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function listMessages()
{
// for pagination
// for simple router url path is enough, for regex ones base path is needed
$pager = new Pager($this->getURLParameters(), $this->getBasePath(), $this->getRouteInfo()->getUrl());
Method safeBatchDeleteMessage
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function safeBatchDeleteMessage()
{
$inputs = (new Request('POST'))->getInputs();
/**
Method batchDeleteMessage
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function batchDeleteMessage()
{
$inputs = (new Request('POST'))->getInputs();
/**
Function batchDeleteMessage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function batchDeleteMessage()
{
$inputs = (new Request('POST'))->getInputs();
/**
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function safeBatchDeleteMessage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function safeBatchDeleteMessage()
{
$inputs = (new Request('POST'))->getInputs();
/**
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The class ContactController has a coupling between objects value of 17. Consider to reduce the number of dependencies under 13. Open
class ContactController extends BaseController
{
/**
* @throws \Exception
*/
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CouplingBetweenObjects
Since: 1.1.0
A class with too many dependencies has negative impacts on several quality aspects of a class. This includes quality criteria like stability, maintainability and understandability
Example
class Foo {
/**
* @var \foo\bar\X
*/
private $x = null;
/**
* @var \foo\bar\Y
*/
private $y = null;
/**
* @var \foo\bar\Z
*/
private $z = null;
public function setFoo(\Foo $foo) {}
public function setBar(\Bar $bar) {}
public function setBaz(\Baz $baz) {}
/**
* @return \SplObjectStorage
* @throws \OutOfRangeException
* @throws \InvalidArgumentException
* @throws \ErrorException
*/
public function process(\Iterator $it) {}
// ...
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/design.html#couplingbetweenobjects
Avoid using static access to class '\CodeJetter\core\Registry' in method 'index'. Open
$language = Registry::getLanguageClass();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Avoid using static access to class '\CodeJetter\core\Registry' in method 'newMessage'. Open
$language = Registry::getLanguageClass();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
StaticAccess
Since: 1.4.0
Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.
Example
class Foo
{
public function bar()
{
Bar::baz();
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function batchDeleteMessage()
{
$inputs = (new Request('POST'))->getInputs();
/**
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 383.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function deleteMessage()
{
$inputs = (new Request('POST'))->getInputs();
if (!empty($inputs['id'])) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 135.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76