Showing 2,470 of 2,470 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace Isotop\Cargo\Admin;
use Isotop\Cargo\Content\Menus;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 184.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace Isotop\Cargo\Admin;
use Isotop\Cargo\Content\Options;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 184.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function run_queue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function run_queue() {
$database = $this->cargo->make( 'database' );
$pusher = $this->cargo->make( 'pusher' );
foreach ( $database->all() as $item ) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prepare_meta
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function prepare_meta( $object_id, $meta ) {
if ( ! is_array( $meta ) ) {
return [];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_item
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function create_item( $menu, $parent_id, $post ) {
$item = [];
$type = get_post_meta( $post->ID, '_menu_item_type', true );
switch ( $type ) {
Avoid using undefined variables such as '$itme' which will lead to PHP notices. Open
$itme['url'] = '';
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
UndefinedVariable
Since: 2.8.0
Detects when a variable is used that has not been defined before.
Example
class Foo
{
private function bar()
{
// $message is undefined
echo $message;
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#undefinedvariable
Method prepare_meta
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected function prepare_meta( $object_id, $meta ) {
if ( ! is_array( $meta ) ) {
return [];
}
Method send
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function send( $data ) {
$options = $this->cargo->config( 'pusher.http', ['url' => ''] );
$options = is_array( $options ) ? $options : ['url' => ''];
$json = $this->to_json( $data );
Function config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function config( string $key, $default = null, array $source = [] ) {
if ( isset( $source[$key] ) ) {
return $source[$key];
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
A file should declare new symbols (classes, functions, constants, etc.) and cause no other side effects, or it should execute logic with side effects, but should not do both. The first symbol is defined on line 12 and the first side effect is on line 35. Open
<?php
- Exclude checks
A file should declare new symbols (classes, functions, constants, etc.) and cause no other side effects, or it should execute logic with side effects, but should not do both. The first symbol is defined on line 12 and the first side effect is on line 35. Open
<?php
- Exclude checks
A file should declare new symbols (classes, functions, constants, etc.) and cause no other side effects, or it should execute logic with side effects, but should not do both. The first symbol is defined on line 16 and the first side effect is on line 50. Open
<?php
- Exclude checks
A file should declare new symbols (classes, functions, constants, etc.) and cause no other side effects, or it should execute logic with side effects, but should not do both. The first symbol is defined on line 15 and the first side effect is on line 29. Open
<?php
- Exclude checks
Avoid variables with short names like $id. Configured minimum length is 3. Open
function push_post_or_term( $id, $post = null ) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ShortVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, local, or parameter has a very short name.
Example
class Something {
private $q = 15; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $as ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$r = 20 + $this->q; // VIOLATION - Local
for (int $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { // Not a Violation (inside FOR)
$r += $this->q;
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/naming.html#shortvariable
The parameter $assoc_args is not named in camelCase. Open
protected function get_format_args( $assoc_args ) {
$format_args = [
'fields' => $this->get_default_format_fields(),
'field' => null,
'format' => 'table',
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}
Source
The parameter $accepted_args is not named in camelCase. Open
public function filter( string $tag, callable $fn, int $priority = 10, int $accepted_args = 1 ) {
$fn = Closure::bind( Closure::fromCallable( $fn ), $this );
if ( ! function_exists( 'add_filter' ) ) {
throw new Exception( 'WordPress not loaded' );
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}
Source
The parameter $assoc_args is not named in camelCase. Open
public function __invoke( $args, $assoc_args ) {
$driver = $assoc_args['driver'] ?? 'basic';
if ( isset( $assoc_args['all'] ) ) {
cargo()->make( sprintf( 'driver.runner.%s', $driver ) )->run_all();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}
Source
The parameter $user_id is not named in camelCase. Open
function push_login( $user_id, $user ) {
$data = new User( $user );
// Send menu to pusher.
$res = cargo()->make( 'pusher' )->send( $data );
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseParameterName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the camelCase notation to name parameters.
Example
class ClassName {
public function doSomething($user_name) {
}
}
Source
The class Abstract_Content is not named in CamelCase. Open
abstract class Abstract_Content implements Content_Interface {
/**
* Content data.
*
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CamelCaseClassName
Since: 0.2
It is considered best practice to use the CamelCase notation to name classes.
Example
class class_name {
}
Source
Avoid variables with short names like $fn. Configured minimum length is 3. Open
public function filter( string $tag, callable $fn, int $priority = 10, int $accepted_args = 1 ) {
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
ShortVariable
Since: 0.2
Detects when a field, local, or parameter has a very short name.
Example
class Something {
private $q = 15; // VIOLATION - Field
public static function main( array $as ) { // VIOLATION - Formal
$r = 20 + $this->q; // VIOLATION - Local
for (int $i = 0; $i < 10; $i++) { // Not a Violation (inside FOR)
$r += $this->q;
}
}
}