ixti/jekyll-assets

View on GitHub
lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

File utils.rb has 264 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

module Jekyll
  module Assets
    module Utils
      def self.activate(gem)
        spec = Gem::Specification
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method prefix_url has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def prefix_url(user_path = nil)
            cfg, j_cfg = asset_config, jekyll.config
            cdn_url = make_https(strip_slashes(cfg[:cdn][:url]))
            base_url = jekyll.config.fetch("baseurl_root", j_cfg["baseurl"])
            destination = strip_slashes(cfg[:destination])
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method manifest_files has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def manifest_files(env)
            manifest = env.manifest.data.values_at(*Manifest.keep_keys).map(&:to_a)
            out = manifest.flatten.each_with_object([]) do |v, a|
              path = Pathutil.new(env.in_dest_dir(v))
              a << path.to_s + ".gz" if path.exist? && !env.skip_gzip?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method prefix_url has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def prefix_url(user_path = nil)
            cfg, j_cfg = asset_config, jekyll.config
            cdn_url = make_https(strip_slashes(cfg[:cdn][:url]))
            base_url = jekyll.config.fetch("baseurl_root", j_cfg["baseurl"])
            destination = strip_slashes(cfg[:destination])
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method raw_precompiles has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def raw_precompiles
              asset_config[:raw_precompile].each_with_object([]) do |h, a|
                h = { source: h } unless h.is_a?(Hash)
                r = Regexp.new(h[:strip]) if h.key?(:strip)
                s = h.fetch(:source) { h.fetch(:src) }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method external_asset has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def external_asset(url, args:)
              if args[:asset]&.key?(:type)
                url_asset(url, {
                  type: args[:asset][:type],
                })
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def base_url?
              c_url = asset_config[:cdn][:url]
              c_cfg = asset_config[:cdn]
              Jekyll.dev? || !c_url || (
                Jekyll.production? && c_url && c_cfg[
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb on lines 286..294

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 26.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def destination?
              c_url = asset_config[:cdn][:url]
              c_cfg = asset_config[:cdn]
              Jekyll.dev? || !c_url || (
                Jekyll.production? && c_url && c_cfg[
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
      lib/jekyll/assets/utils.rb on lines 296..304

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 26.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status