Showing 10 of 10 total issues
File jamie.rb
has 1047 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'base64'
require 'benchmark'
require 'celluloid'
require 'delegate'
require 'digest'
File cli.rb
has 426 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'benchmark'
require 'ostruct'
require 'thor'
require 'jamie'
Class Instance
has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Instance
include Celluloid
include Logging
Class Config
has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Config
attr_writer :yaml_file
attr_writer :platforms
attr_writer :suites
Method default_yaml
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def default_yaml
url_base = "https://opscode-vm.s3.amazonaws.com/vagrant/boxes"
platforms = [
{ :n => 'ubuntu', :vers => %w(12.04 10.04), :rl => "recipe[apt]" },
{ :n => 'centos', :vers => %w(6.3 5.8), :rl => "recipe[yum::epel]" },
Method add_plugins
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_plugins
prompt_add = "Add a Driver plugin to your Gemfile? (y/n)>"
prompt_name = "Enter gem name, `list', or `skip'>"
if yes?(prompt_add, :green)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method required_config
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.required_config(attr, &block)
@validations = [] if @validations.nil?
if ! block_given?
klass = self
block = lambda do |attr, value|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pry_prompts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pry_prompts
[
proc { |target_self, nest_level, pry|
["[#{pry.input_array.size}] ",
"jc(#{Pry.view_clip(target_self.class)})",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
proc { |target_self, nest_level, pry|
["[#{pry.input_array.size}] ",
"jc(#{Pry.view_clip(target_self.class)})",
"#{":#{nest_level}" unless nest_level.zero?}> "
].join
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
proc { |target_self, nest_level, pry|
["[#{pry.input_array.size}] ",
"jc(#{Pry.view_clip(target_self.class)})",
"#{":#{nest_level}" unless nest_level.zero?}* "
].join
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 27.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76