Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options={})
@peaks = options.key?(:peaks) ? options[:peaks] : []
@source = options.key?(:source) ? options[:source] : nil
@calibration= options.key?(:calibration) ? options[:calibration] : [0, 1]
@livetime = options.key?(:livetime) ? options[:livetime] : 1- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method calibrate has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calibrate
if @peaks.empty? or @peaks.select{|p| p.key?(:channel)}.empty?
raise "Nothing to calibrate"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method apply_linefit has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply_linefit(peaks)
#calibrate using linefit
mpeaks = peaks.delete_if{|p| p[:energy] == nil}
x = mpeaks.collect{|p| p[:channel]}
y = mpeaks.collect{|p| p[:energy]}- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method match_channels has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def match_channels(source=@source, rounding=4)
@peaks.each do |peak|
source.transitions.each do |transition|
if channel_energy(peak[:channel]).to_f.approx_equal?(transition[:energy], rounding)
peak[:energy] = transition[:energy]- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"