Showing 21 of 30 total issues
Function prototype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 67 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Searcher.prototype = new function() {
// search is performed in chunks of 1000 for non-blocking user input
var CHUNK_SIZE = 1000;
// do not try to find more than 100 results
var MAX_RESULTS = 100;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prototype
has 160 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Searcher.prototype = new function() {
// search is performed in chunks of 1000 for non-blocking user input
var CHUNK_SIZE = 1000;
// do not try to find more than 100 results
var MAX_RESULTS = 100;
File tablestakes.rb
has 367 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Table
# The headers attribute contains the table headers used to reference
# columns in the +Table+. All headers are represented as +String+ types.
#
Class Table
has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Table
# The headers attribute contains the table headers used to reference
# columns in the +Table+. All headers are represented as +String+ types.
#
Function prototype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Search.prototype = $.extend({}, Navigation, new function() {
var suid = 1;
this.init = function() {
var _this = this;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function prototype
has 82 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Search.prototype = $.extend({}, Navigation, new function() {
var suid = 1;
this.init = function() {
var _this = this;
Method count
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def count(colname=nil, value=nil)
if colname.nil? || value.nil?
if @table.size > 0
@table.each_key {|e| return @table.fetch(e).length }
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function performSearch
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function performSearch(data, regexps, queries, highlighters, state) {
var searchIndex = data.searchIndex;
var longSearchIndex = data.longSearchIndex;
var info = data.info;
var result = [];
Method select
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def select(*columns)
# check arguments
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name(s)" unless columns
columns.kind_of?(Array) ? columns.flatten! : nil
columns.each do |c|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sub
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sub(colname, match=nil, replace=nil, &block)
# check arguments
raise ArgumentError, "No regular expression to match against" unless match || block_given?
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless @table.has_key?(colname)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method join
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def join(table2, colname, col2name=colname)
# check arguments
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid table!" unless table2.is_a?(Table)
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless @table.has_key?(colname)
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless table2.headers.include?(col2name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method where
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def where(colname, condition=nil)
# check arguments
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid Column Name" unless @headers.include?(colname)
result = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function onkeydown
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.onkeydown = function(e) {
if (!this.navigationActive) return;
switch(e.keyCode) {
case 37: //Event.KEY_LEFT:
if (this.moveLeft()) e.preventDefault();
Function performSearch
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function performSearch(data, regexps, queries, highlighters, state) {
Method add_row
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_row(*row)
if row.kind_of? Array
row = row.flatten
end
if @headers.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method union
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def union(table2, colname, col2name=colname)
# check arguments
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid table!" unless table2.is_a?(Table)
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless @table.has_key?(colname)
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless table2.headers.include?(col2name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method read_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_file(filename)
file = File.open(filename, "r")
result = []
file.each_line do |line|
result << line.chomp.split("\t")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function hookSearch
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function hookSearch() {
var input = $('#search-field').eq(0);
var result = $('#search-results').eq(0);
$(result).show();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rename_header
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rename_header(orig_name, new_name)
raise ArgumentError, "Original Column name type invalid" unless orig_name.kind_of? String
raise ArgumentError, "New Column name type invalid" unless new_name.kind_of? String
raise ArgumentError, "Column Name does not exist!" unless @headers.include? orig_name
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method intersect
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def intersect(table2, colname, col2name=colname)
# check arguments
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid table!" unless table2.is_a?(Table)
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless @table.has_key?(colname)
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid column name" unless table2.headers.include?(col2name)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"