Showing 159 of 159 total issues
Function process_archive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_archive(self, archive, prefix=[]):
"""Build fuse inode hierarchy from archive metadata
"""
unpacker = msgpack.Unpacker()
for key, chunk in zip(archive.metadata[b'items'], self.repository.get_many(archive.metadata[b'items'])):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def test_crash_before_compact_segments(self):
self.add_keys()
self.repository.compact_segments = None
try:
self.repository.commit()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def test_crash_before_write_index(self):
self.add_keys()
self.repository.write_index = None
try:
self.repository.commit()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function restore_attrs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def restore_attrs(self, path, item, symlink=False, fd=None):
xattrs = item.get(b'xattrs')
if xattrs:
for k, v in xattrs.items():
try:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function __next__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __next__(self):
if self._resync:
data = b''.join(self._buffered_data)
while self._resync:
if not data:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function run
has 92 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run(self, args=None):
check_extension_modules()
keys_dir = get_keys_dir()
if not os.path.exists(keys_dir):
os.makedirs(keys_dir)
Function do_extract
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_extract(self, args):
"""Extract archive contents"""
# be restrictive when restoring files, restore permissions later
if sys.getfilesystemencoding() == 'ascii':
print('Warning: File system encoding is "ascii", extracting non-ascii filenames will not be supported.')
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function replay_segments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def replay_segments(self, index_transaction_id, segments_transaction_id):
self.prepare_txn(index_transaction_id, do_cleanup=False)
for segment, filename in self.io.segment_iterator():
if index_transaction_id is not None and segment <= index_transaction_id:
continue
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function do_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def do_list(self, args):
"""List archive or repository contents"""
repository = self.open_repository(args.src)
manifest, key = Manifest.load(repository)
if args.src.archive:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try:
self.attic('mount', self.repository_location, mountpoint, fork=True)
self.wait_for_mount(mountpoint)
self.assert_dirs_equal(self.input_path, os.path.join(mountpoint, 'archive', 'input'))
self.assert_dirs_equal(self.input_path, os.path.join(mountpoint, 'archive2', 'input'))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try:
self.attic('mount', self.repository_location + '::archive', mountpoint, fork=True)
self.wait_for_mount(mountpoint)
self.assert_dirs_equal(self.input_path, os.path.join(mountpoint, 'input'))
finally:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _process
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _process(self, archive, cache, excludes, exclude_caches, skip_inodes, path, restrict_dev):
if exclude_path(path, excludes):
return
try:
st = os.lstat(path)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function serve
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def serve(self):
stdin_fd = sys.stdin.fileno()
stdout_fd = sys.stdout.fileno()
# Make stdin non-blocking
fl = fcntl.fcntl(stdin_fd, fcntl.F_GETFL)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
ArchiverTestCase
has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ArchiverTestCase(ArchiverTestCaseBase):
def create_regular_file(self, name, size=0, contents=None):
filename = os.path.join(self.input_path, name)
if not os.path.exists(os.path.dirname(filename)):
Function compact_segments
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compact_segments(self):
"""Compact sparse segments by copying data into new segments
"""
if not self.compact:
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function sync
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync(self):
"""Initializes cache by fetching and reading all archive indicies
"""
def add(id, size, csize):
try:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File key.py
has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
from binascii import hexlify, a2b_base64, b2a_base64
from getpass import getpass
import os
import msgpack
import textwrap
File repository.py
has 268 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import os
import shutil
import tempfile
from attic.testsuite.mock import patch
from attic.hashindex import NSIndex
File remote.py
has 265 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import errno
import fcntl
import msgpack
import os
import select
Repository
has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Repository(object):
"""Filesystem based transactional key value store
On disk layout:
dir/README