Showing 19 of 19 total issues
Function terminal
has 277 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var terminal = (function($) {
return function({ selector, lips, dynamic = false, name = 'terminal' }, undefined) {
var position;
var timer;
var help = lips.env.get('help');
Function terminal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 63 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var terminal = (function($) {
return function({ selector, lips, dynamic = false, name = 'terminal' }, undefined) {
var position;
var timer;
var help = lips.env.get('help');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function token
has 147 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
token: function (stream, state) {
if (state.indentStack == null && stream.sol()) {
// update indentation, but only if indentStack is empty
state.indentation = stream.indentation();
}
Function init
has 93 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function init() {
var t = $('.terminal.lips');
if (t.length) {
t.each(function() {
$(this).terminal().destroy().remove();
File terminal.js
has 279 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* This is example of usuage of LIPS interprter with jQuery Terminal
*
* Features: tab completion
* parenthesis matching
Function keypress
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
keypress: function(e) {
var term = this;
function is_open(token) {
return ['(', '['].indexOf(token) !== -1;
}
Function term
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var term = $(selector).terminal(function(code, term) {
// format before executing mainly for strings in function docs
//code = new lips.Formatter(code).format();
return interpreter.exec(code, dynamic).then(function(ret) {
ret.forEach(function(ret) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(typeof state.sExprQuote == "number"){
if(--state.sExprQuote == 0){
returnType = ATOM; // final closing bracket
state.sExprQuote = false; // turn off s-expr quote mode
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(typeof state.sExprComment == "number"){
if(--state.sExprComment == 0){
returnType = COMMENT; // final closing bracket
state.sExprComment = false; // turn off s-expr commenting mode
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 58.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (self.next().is('.' + cls)) {
last = self.nextUntil(':not(.' + cls + ')').last();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (self.prev().is('.' + cls)) {
first = self.prevUntil(':not(.' + cls + ')').last();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (stream.eat(/[ei]/i)) {
hasExactness = true;
} else {
stream.backUp(1); // must be radix specifier
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (stream.match(/^#b/i)) {
numTest = isBinaryNumber;
} else if (stream.match(/^#o/i)) {
numTest = isOctalNumber;
} else if (stream.match(/^#x/i)) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(typeof state.sExprQuote == "number") state.sExprQuote++;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (numTest != null) {
if (hasRadix && !hasExactness) {
// consume optional exactness after radix
stream.match(/^#[ei]/i);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
while ((letter = stream.eat(/[^\s\(\[\;\)\]]/)) != null) {
keyWord += letter;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (ch == ")" || ch == "]") {
returnType = BRACKET;
if (state.indentStack != null && state.indentStack.type == (ch == ")" ? "(" : "[")) {
popStack(state);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (keyWord.length > 0 && indentKeys.propertyIsEnumerable(keyWord)) { // indent-word
pushStack(state, indentTemp + INDENT_WORD_SKIP, ch);
} else if (keyWord.match(/^:/)) {
pushStack(state, indentTemp + 1, ch);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if(typeof state.sExprComment == "number") state.sExprComment++;