Showing 7 of 7 total issues
Method clean_html
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean_html( text, allowed_tags = BASIC_TAGS )
text.gsub!( /<!\[CDATA\[/, '' )
text.gsub!( /<(\/*)([A-Za-z]\w*+)([^>]*?)(\s?\/?)>/ ) do |m|
raw = $~
tag = raw[2].downcase
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File html.rb
has 289 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module RedCloth::Formatters::HTML
include RedCloth::Formatters::Base
[:h1, :h2, :h3, :h4, :h5, :h6, :p, :pre, :div].each do |m|
define_method(m) do |opts|
Method pba
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pba(opts)
opts.delete(:style) if filter_styles
opts.delete(:class) if filter_classes
opts.delete(:id) if filter_ids
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clean_html
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clean_html( text, allowed_tags = BASIC_TAGS )
text.gsub!( /<!\[CDATA\[/, '' )
text.gsub!( /<(\/*)([A-Za-z]\w*+)([^>]*?)(\s?\/?)>/ ) do |m|
raw = $~
tag = raw[2].downcase
Method ensure_ragel_version
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ensure_ragel_version
@ragel_v ||= `ragel -v`[/(version )(\S*)/,2].split('.').map{|s| s.to_i}
raise unless @ragel_v[0] > 6 || (@ragel_v[0] == 6 && @ragel_v[1] >= 3)
rescue
STDERR.puts "Ragel 6.3 or greater is required."
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method image
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def image(opts)
if (filter_html || sanitize_html) && ( opts[:src] =~ /^\s*javascript:/i || opts[:href] =~ /^\s*javascript:/i )
opts[:title]
else
opts.delete(:align)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method define_ragel_tasks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_ragel_tasks
machines.each do |machine|
file target(machine) => [*ragel_sources(machine)] do
mkdir_p(File.dirname(target(machine))) unless File.directory?(File.dirname(target(machine)))
ensure_ragel_version
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"