JobScheduleDeleteParams has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type JobScheduleDeleteParams struct {
/*IfMatch
An ETag is specified. Specify this header to perform the operation only if the resource's ETag is an exact match as specified.
Method JobScheduleDeleteParams.WriteToRequest has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *JobScheduleDeleteParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method JobScheduleDeleteParams.WriteToRequest has 63 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (o *JobScheduleDeleteParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Method JobScheduleDeleteParams.WriteToRequest has 12 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (o *JobScheduleDeleteParams) WriteToRequest(r runtime.ClientRequest, reg strfmt.Registry) error {
r.SetTimeout(o.requestTimeout)
var res []error
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
package job_schedules
// This file was generated by the swagger tool.
// Editing this file might prove futile when you re-run the swagger generate command
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 2194.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Your code does not pass gofmt in 1 place. Go fmt your code! Open
package job_schedules- Exclude checks
var returnClientRequestIdDefault should be returnClientRequestIDDefault Open
returnClientRequestIdDefault = bool(false)- Exclude checks
don't use an underscore in package name Open
package job_schedules- Exclude checks