Showing 103 of 103 total issues
Function Gmaps4Rails
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Gmaps4Rails() {
this.map = null;
this.serviceObject = null;
this.visibleInfoWindow = null;
this.userLocation = null;
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method sync_down
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync_down(evernote_note)
evernote_note.build_note if evernote_note.note.nil?
self.evernote_note = evernote_note
self.guid = evernote_note.cloud_note_identifier
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Gmaps4RailsGoogle
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Gmaps4RailsGoogle() {
Gmaps4RailsGoogle.__super__.constructor.apply(this, arguments);
this.map_options = {
disableDefaultUI: false,
disableDoubleClickZoom: false,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (_i = 0, _len = _ref.length; _i < _len; _i++) {
marker = _ref[_i];
_results.push(this.boundsObject.extend(marker.serviceObject.latLng));
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (_i = 0, _len = _ref.length; _i < _len; _i++) {
marker = _ref[_i];
_results.push(this.boundsObject.extend(marker.serviceObject.position));
}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method calculate_after
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.calculate_after(current)
return last_text if current == last_text
alphabet = self.alphabet.split('')
alphabet_without_space = alphabet - [' ']
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ((circle.lat != null) && (circle.lng != null)) {
newCircle = new google.maps.Circle({
center: this.createLatLng(circle.lat, circle.lng),
strokeColor: circle.strokeColor || this.circles_conf.strokeColor,
strokeOpacity: circle.strokeOpacity || this.circles_conf.strokeOpacity,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function createClusterer
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4RailsOpenlayers.prototype.createClusterer = function(markers_array) {
var clusters, funcs, options, strategy, style;
options = {
pointRadius: "${radius}",
fillColor: "#ffcc66",
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method cut_image_binary
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cut_image_binary(id, _format, aspect_x, aspect_y, width, snap, gravity, effects)
image_record = Resource.find(id)
file_name_template = image_record.template_location(aspect_x, aspect_y)
file_name_out = image_record.cut_location(aspect_x, aspect_y, width, snap, gravity, effects)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method from_omniauth
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.from_omniauth(auth, current_user)
authorization = Authorization.where(provider: auth.provider, uid: auth.uid.to_s).first_or_initialize
authorization.token = auth.credentials.token
authorization.secret = auth.credentials.secret
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method show
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
@tag = Tag.find_by_slug(params[:slug]) # .friendly.find is not working here
@notes = Note.publishable.listable.blurbable.tagged_with(@tag.name)
@word_count = @notes.sum(:word_count)
@map = mapify(@notes.mappable)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function createMarker
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4RailsGoogle.prototype.createMarker = function(args) {
var defaultOptions, imageAnchorPosition, markerImage, markerLatLng, mergedOptions, shadowAnchorPosition, shadowImage;
markerLatLng = this.createLatLng(args.Lat, args.Lng);
if (args.marker_picture === "" && args.rich_marker === null) {
defaultOptions = {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function createMarker
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4RailsOpenlayers.prototype.createMarker = function(args) {
var marker, style_mark;
style_mark = OpenLayers.Util.extend({}, OpenLayers.Feature.Vector.style['default']);
style_mark.fillOpacity = 1;
if (this.markersLayer === null) {
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method cut_image_binary
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cut_image_binary(id, _format, aspect_x, aspect_y, width, snap, gravity, effects)
image_record = Resource.find(id)
file_name_template = image_record.template_location(aspect_x, aspect_y)
file_name_out = image_record.cut_location(aspect_x, aspect_y, width, snap, gravity, effects)
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function createServiceMarkersFromMarkers
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4Rails.prototype.createServiceMarkersFromMarkers = function() {
var Lat, LatLng, Lng, index, marker, _len, _ref;
_ref = this.markers;
for (index = 0, _len = _ref.length; index < _len; index++) {
marker = _ref[index];
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function create_polyline
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4RailsGoogle.prototype.create_polyline = function(polyline) {
var clickable, decoded_array, element, latlng, new_poly, point, polyline_coordinates, strokeColor, strokeOpacity, strokeWeight, zIndex, _i, _j, _len, _len2;
polyline_coordinates = [];
for (_i = 0, _len = polyline.length; _i < _len; _i++) {
element = polyline[_i];
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function create_polyline
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4RailsOpenlayers.prototype.create_polyline = function(polyline) {
var clickable, element, latlng, line_points, line_style, polyline_coordinates, strokeColor, strokeOpacity, strokeWeight, zIndex, _i, _len;
if (this.polylinesLayer === null) {
this.polylinesLayer = new OpenLayers.Layer.Vector("Polylines", null);
this.serviceObject.addLayer(this.polylinesLayer);
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Function create_circle
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4Rails.prototype.create_circle = function(circle) {
var newCircle;
if (circle === this.circles[0]) {
if (circle.strokeColor != null) {
this.circles_conf.strokeColor = circle.strokeColor;
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method blurb
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def blurb(main_title, subtitle, clean_body, introduction = nil, blurb_length = NB.blurb_length.to_i, omission: NB.blurb_omission)
headline = subtitle.blank? ? "#{ main_title }" : "<span>#{ main_title }: </span>#{ subtitle }"
# If an introduction exists, use it
# If the title is derived from the body, do not include it in the blurb
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create_direction
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Gmaps4Rails.prototype.create_direction = function() {
var directionsDisplay, directionsService, request;
directionsDisplay = new google.maps.DirectionsRenderer();
directionsService = new google.maps.DirectionsService();
directionsDisplay.setMap(this.serviceObject);
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket