jon48/webtrees-lib

View on GitHub
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function oneLinkedSource has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function oneLinkedSource(Certificate $certificate): ?Source
    {
        $regex_query = preg_quote($certificate->gedcomPath(), '/');
        $regex_pattern = '/[1-9] SOUR @(' . Gedcom::REGEX_XREF . ')@(?:\n[2-9]\s(?:(?!SOUR)\w+)\s.*)*\n[2-9] _ACT ' . $regex_query . '/i'; //phpcs:ignore Generic.Files.LineLength.TooLong

Severity: Minor
Found in app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid using static access to class '\Fisharebest\Webtrees\GedcomRecord' in method 'linkedMedias'.
Open

            ->filter(GedcomRecord::accessFilter());

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Avoid using static access to class '\Fisharebest\Webtrees\GedcomRecord' in method 'linkedNotes'.
Open

            ->filter(GedcomRecord::accessFilter());

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Avoid using static access to class '\Fisharebest\Webtrees\GedcomRecord' in method 'linkedFamilies'.
Open

            ->filter(GedcomRecord::accessFilter());

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Avoid using static access to class '\Fisharebest\Webtrees\GedcomRecord' in method 'linkedIndividuals'.
Open

            ->filter(GedcomRecord::accessFilter());

StaticAccess

Since: 1.4.0

Static access causes unexchangeable dependencies to other classes and leads to hard to test code. Avoid using static access at all costs and instead inject dependencies through the constructor. The only case when static access is acceptable is when used for factory methods.

Example

class Foo
{
    public function bar()
    {
        Bar::baz();
    }
}

Source https://phpmd.org/rules/cleancode.html#staticaccess

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function linkedIndividuals(Certificate $certificate): Collection
    {
        $tree = $certificate->tree();
        return DB::table('individuals')
            ->where('i_file', '=', $tree->id())
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php on lines 61..71
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php on lines 82..92

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 114.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function linkedMedias(Certificate $certificate): Collection
    {
        $tree = $certificate->tree();
        return DB::table('media')
            ->where('m_file', '=', $tree->id())
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php on lines 40..50
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php on lines 61..71

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 114.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    public function linkedFamilies(Certificate $certificate): Collection
    {
        $tree = $certificate->tree();
        return DB::table('families')
            ->where('f_file', '=', $tree->id())
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php on lines 40..50
app/Module/Certificates/Services/CertificateDataService.php on lines 82..92

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 114.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status