Showing 64 of 64 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else {
$input.prop('checked', false);
if (this.options.selectedClass) {
$input.closest('li')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($(element).is(':selected')) {
$input.prop('checked', true);
if (this.options.selectedClass) {
$input.closest('li')
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 57.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method add_repo
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_repo(gh_repo)
repo = Repository.new(name: gh_repo.name, owner: gh_repo.owner.login)
info = gh_repo.fork ? repo.info.source : gh_repo
#check if the repository is not soft deleted and
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Multiselect
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Multiselect(select, options) {
this.$select = $(select);
// Placeholder via data attributes
Function buildWidget
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var buildWidget = function() {
var $w = $('<div />', { 'class': 'br-widget' });
// create A elements that will replace OPTIONs
self.$elem.find('option').each(function() {
Function selectAll
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
selectAll: function (justVisible, triggerOnSelectAll) {
var justVisible = typeof justVisible === 'undefined' ? true : justVisible;
var allCheckboxes = $("li input[type='checkbox']:enabled", this.$ul);
var visibleCheckboxes = allCheckboxes.filter(":visible");
var allCheckboxesCount = allCheckboxes.length;
Function buttonText
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
buttonText: function(options, select) {
if (options.length === 0) {
return this.nonSelectedText;
}
else if (this.allSelectedText
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
gh_repo = Repository.new(repo_params).info
repo = gh_repo && !gh_repo.fork ? Repository.build_from_gh_info(gh_repo) : false
if repo && repo.save
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method perform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform(repo_owner: , repo_name: , branch_name: , **options)
from_date = options[:from_date].presence || Date.yesterday.beginning_of_day
to_date = options[:to_date].presence || Date.yesterday.end_of_day
Sidekiq.logger.info "************************ Commit Job Logger Info **************************"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
disable: function() {
this.$select.prop('disabled', true);
this.$button.prop('disabled', true)
.addClass('disabled');
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
enable: function() {
this.$select.prop('disabled', false);
this.$button.prop('disabled', false)
.removeClass('disabled');
},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (value) {
buffer += renderTokens(token[4], writer, context, template);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
} else if (value) {
buffer += renderTokens(token[4], writer, context.push(value), template);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for (var j = 0, jlen = value.length; j < jlen; ++j) {
buffer += renderTokens(token[4], writer, context.push(value[j]), template);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (this.options.enableCaseInsensitiveFiltering && filterCandidate.toLowerCase().indexOf(this.query.toLowerCase()) > -1) {
showElement = true;
}
else if (filterCandidate.indexOf(this.query) > -1) {
showElement = true;
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ($(element).hasClass('multiselect-group')) {
// Remember group status.
currentGroup = element;
currentGroupVisible = showElement;
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (value != null) buffer += value;
Function init
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function(element, valueAccessor, allBindings, viewModel, bindingContext) {
Function update
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
update: function(element, valueAccessor, allBindings, viewModel, bindingContext) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def get
contributions = Commit.collection.aggregate([match, project, group, sort])
contributions.collect do |r|
[
"#{Date::ABBR_MONTHNAMES[r['_id']['month']]} #{r['_id']['year']}",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 36.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76