deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File ll_prof.py has 803 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# Copyright 2012 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved.
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
Severity: Major
Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 1 day to fix

    Function ReadUpToGC has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def ReadUpToGC(self):
        while self.log_pos < self.log.size():
          tag = self.log[self.log_pos]
          self.log_pos += 1
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 5 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function Load has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def Load(self, mmap_info, code_map, options):
        # Skip kernel mmaps when requested using the fact that their tid
        # is 0.
        if mmap_info.tid == 0 and not options.kernel:
          return True
    Severity: Minor
    Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 4 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function PrintAnnotated has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def PrintAnnotated(self, arch, options):
        if self.self_ticks_map is None:
          ticks_map = []
        else:
          ticks_map = self.self_ticks_map.items()
    Severity: Minor
    Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
    Open

            if code.codetype == Code.OPTIMIZED:
              optimized_ticks += 1
            elif code.codetype == Code.FULL_CODEGEN:
              generated_ticks += 1
            elif code.codetype == Code.V8INTERNAL:
    Severity: Major
    Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 45 mins to fix

      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
      Open

              for ip in sample.ips:
                caller_code = code_map.Find(ip)
                if caller_code:
                  if code:
                    caller_code.CalleeTick(code)
      Severity: Major
      Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Function PrintDot has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        def PrintDot(code_map, options):
          print "digraph G {"
          for code in code_map.UsedCode():
            if code.self_ticks < 10:
              continue
        Severity: Minor
        Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function __init__ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def __init__(self, name, start_address, end_address, origin, origin_offset):
        Severity: Minor
        Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 35 mins to fix

          Function PrintReport has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          def PrintReport(code_map, library_repo, arch, ticks, options):
          Severity: Minor
          Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 35 mins to fix

            Function _LoadKernelSymbols has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def _LoadKernelSymbols(self, code_map):
                if not os.path.exists(KERNEL_ALLSYMS_FILE):
                  print >>sys.stderr, "Warning: %s not found" % KERNEL_ALLSYMS_FILE
                  return False
                kallsyms = open(KERNEL_ALLSYMS_FILE, "r")
            Severity: Minor
            Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function Add has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def Add(self, code, max_pages=-1):
                page_id = CodePage.PageId(code.start_address)
                limit_id = CodePage.PageId(code.end_address + CodePage.SIZE - 1)
                pages = 0
                while page_id < limit_id:
            Severity: Minor
            Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 35 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function AllCode has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def AllCode(self):
                for page in self.pages.itervalues():
                  for code in page:
                    if CodePage.PageAddress(code.start_address) == page.address:
                      yield code
            Severity: Minor
            Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py - About 25 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    if code.codetype == Code.OPTIMIZED:
                      optimized_ticks += 1
                    elif code.codetype == Code.FULL_CODEGEN:
                      generated_ticks += 1
                    elif code.codetype == Code.V8INTERNAL:
            Severity: Major
            Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            tools/closure_linter/closure_linter/statetracker.py on lines 393..396

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 43.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

              if os.path.exists(options.objdump):
                disasm.OBJDUMP_BIN = options.objdump
                OBJDUMP_BIN = options.objdump
              else:
                print "Cannot find %s, falling back to default objdump" % options.objdump
            Severity: Major
            Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
            deps/v8/tools/grokdump.py on lines 3141..3145

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 42.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    return ", ".join("%s: %s" % (field, self.__getattribute__(field))
                                     for field, _ in TraceItem._fields_)
            Severity: Minor
            Found in deps/v8/tools/ll_prof.py and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
            deps/v8/tools/grokdump.py on lines 113..114

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 35.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status