kaize/validates

View on GitHub

Showing 3 of 3 total issues

Method valid? has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def valid?(ean)
    return false if ean.blank?
    return false unless ean =~ /^\d+$/
    return false unless (8..13).include?(ean.length)
    return false unless calc_check_digit(ean)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/ean_validator.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method email_format_valid? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def email_format_valid?(email)
    domain, local = email.reverse.split('@', 2)

    return false if domain.blank? || local.blank?
    return false if email.length > MAX_EMAIL_LENGTH
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/email_validator.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method email_domain_syntax_valid? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def email_domain_syntax_valid?(domain)
    parts = domain.reverse.downcase.gsub(/(?:^\[(.+)\]$)/,'\1').split('.', -1)

    return false if parts.size == 1 && options[:reject_one_level_domain]
    return false unless parts.all? { |part| part =~ /^(?!\-)[[:alnum:]\-]+(?<!\-)$/ && part.length < MAX_DOMAIN_PART_LENGTH }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/email_validator.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language