Showing 258 of 258 total issues
Function stringify
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function stringify (obj, depth) {
if (depth === 0) {
return '...'
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parseConfig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseConfig (configFilePath, cliOptions, parseOptions) {
const promiseConfig = parseOptions && parseOptions.promiseConfig === true
const throwErrors = parseOptions && parseOptions.throwErrors === true
const shouldSetupLoggerEarly = promiseConfig
if (shouldSetupLoggerEarly) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 8
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],8:[function(require,module,exports){
/**
* Module dependencies.
*/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function 6
has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],6:[function(require,module,exports){
/**
* Module dependencies.
*/
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _start
has 164 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
async _start (config, launcher, preprocess, fileList, capturedBrowsers, executor, done) {
if (config.detached) {
this._detach(config, done)
return
}
Function 3
has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],3:[function(require,module,exports){
// Load our dependencies
var stringify = require('../common/stringify')
// Define our context Karma constructor
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File config.js
has 407 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'use strict'
const path = require('path')
const assert = require('assert')
Function BaseReporter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const BaseReporter = function (formatError, reportSlow, useColors, browserConsoleLogOptions, adapter) {
this.adapters = [adapter || process.stdout.write.bind(process.stdout)]
this.USE_COLORS = false
this.EXCLUSIVELY_USE_COLORS = undefined
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File server.js
has 395 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'use strict'
const SocketIO = require('socket.io')
const di = require('di')
const util = require('util')
Function createKarmaMiddleware
has 137 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function createKarmaMiddleware (
filesPromise,
serveStaticFile,
serveFile,
injector,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (cliOptionsOrConfig instanceof cfg.Config) {
config = cliOptionsOrConfig
} else {
logger.setupFromConfig({
colors: cliOptionsOrConfig.colors,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 142.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (cliOptionsOrConfig instanceof cfg.Config) {
config = cliOptionsOrConfig
} else {
logger.setupFromConfig({
colors: cliOptionsOrConfig.colors,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 142.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function 8
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],8:[function(require,module,exports){
/**
* Module dependencies.
*/
Function 6
has 127 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],6:[function(require,module,exports){
/**
* Module dependencies.
*/
Function normalizeConfig
has 125 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function normalizeConfig (config, configFilePath) {
function basePathResolve (relativePath) {
if (helper.isUrlAbsolute(relativePath)) {
return relativePath
} else if (helper.isDefined(config.basePath) && helper.isDefined(relativePath)) {
Function normalizeConfig
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function normalizeConfig (config, configFilePath) {
function basePathResolve (relativePath) {
if (helper.isUrlAbsolute(relativePath)) {
return relativePath
} else if (helper.isDefined(config.basePath) && helper.isDefined(relativePath)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function processArgs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function processArgs (argv, options, fs, path) {
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(argv).forEach(function (name) {
let argumentValue = argv[name]
if (name !== '_' && name !== '$0') {
if (Array.isArray(argumentValue)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ProcessLauncher
has 120 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ProcessLauncher (spawn, tempDir, timer, processKillTimeout) {
const self = this
let onExitCallback
const killTimeout = processKillTimeout || 2000
// Will hold output from the spawned child process
Function parseConfig
has 115 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function parseConfig (configFilePath, cliOptions, parseOptions) {
const promiseConfig = parseOptions && parseOptions.promiseConfig === true
const throwErrors = parseOptions && parseOptions.throwErrors === true
const shouldSetupLoggerEarly = promiseConfig
if (shouldSetupLoggerEarly) {
Function 3
has 114 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
},{}],3:[function(require,module,exports){
// Load our dependencies
var stringify = require('../common/stringify')
// Define our context Karma constructor