Showing 179 of 179 total issues
File jquery.js
has 6116 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* jQuery JavaScript Library v1.6.1
* http://jquery.com/
*
* Copyright 2011, John Resig
Function jQuery
has 571 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var jQuery = (function() {
// Define a local copy of jQuery
var jQuery = function( selector, context ) {
// The jQuery object is actually just the init constructor 'enhanced'
Function ajax
has 239 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
Function tipTip
has 152 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$.fn.tipTip = function(options) {
var defaults = {
activation: "hover",
keepAlive: false,
maxWidth: "200px",
Function support
has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.support = (function() {
var div = document.createElement( "div" ),
documentElement = document.documentElement,
all,
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( event.pageX == null && event.clientX != null ) {
var eventDocument = event.target.ownerDocument || document,
doc = eventDocument.documentElement,
body = eventDocument.body;
Function Sizzle
has 108 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Sizzle = function( selector, context, results, seed ) {
results = results || [];
context = context || document;
var origContext = context;
Function send
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
send: function( headers, complete ) {
// Get a new xhr
var xhr = s.xhr(),
handle,
Function remove
has 85 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
remove: function( elem, types, handler, pos ) {
// don't do events on text and comment nodes
if ( elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 ) {
return;
}
Function trigger
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
// Event object or event type
var type = event.type || event,
namespaces = [],
exclusive;
Function animate
has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
animate: function( prop, speed, easing, callback ) {
var optall = jQuery.speed(speed, easing, callback);
if ( jQuery.isEmptyObject( prop ) ) {
return this.each( optall.complete, [ false ] );
Function clean
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
clean: function( elems, context, fragment, scripts ) {
var checkScriptType;
context = context || document;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"~": function( checkSet, part, isXML ) {
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"": function(checkSet, part, isXML){
var nodeCheck,
doneName = done++,
checkFn = dirCheck;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if ( "getBoundingClientRect" in document.documentElement ) {
jQuery.fn.offset = function( options ) {
var elem = this[0], box;
if ( options ) {
Function add
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
add: function( elem, types, handler, data ) {
if ( elem.nodeType === 3 || elem.nodeType === 8 ) {
return;
}
Function active_tiptip
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function active_tiptip(){
opts.enter.call(this);
tiptip_content.html(org_title);
tiptip_holder.hide().removeAttr("class").css("margin","0");
tiptip_arrow.removeAttr("style");
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
if params[:auth_token].blank?
render :status => 422, :xml => <<-EOS
<error>#{t(:message_token_missing_parametr)}</error>
EOS
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function filter
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Sizzle.filter = function( expr, set, inplace, not ) {
var match, anyFound,
old = expr,
result = [],
curLoop = set,
Function done
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done( status, statusText, responses, headers ) {
// Called once
if ( state === 2 ) {
return;