lib/required_software.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
5 hrs
Test Coverage

Possible command injection
Open

        command_found = `#{command_test}`
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb by brakeman

Injection is #1 on the 2010 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. Command injection occurs when shell commands unsafely include user-manipulatable values.

There are many ways to run commands in Ruby:

`ls #{params[:file]}`

system("ls #{params[:dir]}")

exec("md5sum #{params[:input]}")

Brakeman will warn on any method like these that uses user input or unsafely interpolates variables.

See the Ruby Security Guide for details.

Method has too many lines. [33/10]
Open

    def missing_libs(required_software, lib_type = 'gems', args = {})
      missing_libs = []
      required_libs = {}

      required_software[lib_type].each do |key, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.

Method missing_libs has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def missing_libs(required_software, lib_type = 'gems', args = {})
      missing_libs = []
      required_libs = {}

      required_software[lib_type].each do |key, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Assignment Branch Condition size for missing_libs is too high. [29.34/15]
Open

    def missing_libs(required_software, lib_type = 'gems', args = {})
      missing_libs = []
      required_libs = {}

      required_software[lib_type].each do |key, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Perceived complexity for missing_libs is too high. [15/7]
Open

    def missing_libs(required_software, lib_type = 'gems', args = {})
      missing_libs = []
      required_libs = {}

      required_software[lib_type].each do |key, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Cyclomatic complexity for missing_libs is too high. [12/6]
Open

    def missing_libs(required_software, lib_type = 'gems', args = {})
      missing_libs = []
      required_libs = {}

      required_software[lib_type].each do |key, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method missing_libs has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def missing_libs(required_software, lib_type = 'gems', args = {})
      missing_libs = []
      required_libs = {}

      required_software[lib_type].each do |key, value|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/required_software.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Use each_value instead of values.each.
    Open

          required_libs.values.each do |lib|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for uses of each_key and each_value Hash methods.

    Note: If you have an array of two-element arrays, you can put parentheses around the block arguments to indicate that you're not working with a hash, and suppress RuboCop offenses.

    Example:

    # bad
    hash.keys.each { |k| p k }
    hash.values.each { |v| p v }
    hash.each { |k, _v| p k }
    hash.each { |_k, v| p v }
    
    # good
    hash.each_key { |k| p k }
    hash.each_value { |v| p v }

    Favor modifier if usage when having a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flow &&/||.
    Open

            if command_found.blank?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

    Checks for if and unless statements that would fit on one line if written as a modifier if/unless. The maximum line length is configured in the Metrics/LineLength cop.

    Example:

    # bad
    if condition
      do_stuff(bar)
    end
    
    unless qux.empty?
      Foo.do_something
    end
    
    # good
    do_stuff(bar) if condition
    Foo.do_something unless qux.empty?

    Prefer Object#is_a? over Object#kind_of?.
    Open

            if !value.blank? && value.kind_of?(Hash)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/required_software.rb by rubocop

    This cop enforces consistent use of Object#is_a? or Object#kind_of?.

    Example: EnforcedStyle: is_a? (default)

    # bad
    var.kind_of?(Date)
    var.kind_of?(Integer)
    
    # good
    var.is_a?(Date)
    var.is_a?(Integer)

    Example: EnforcedStyle: kind_of?

    # bad
    var.is_a?(Time)
    var.is_a?(String)
    
    # good
    var.kind_of?(Time)
    var.kind_of?(String)

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status