old_test/integration/caching_test.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
1 day
Test Coverage

File caching_test.rb has 461 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require File.dirname(__FILE__) + '/integration_test_helper'

class CachingTest < ActionController::IntegrationTest
  context "The homepage cache" do
    setup do
Severity: Minor
Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb - About 7 hrs to fix

    Method check_cache_current_for has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def check_cache_current_for(item, options = {})
        visit "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}" unless options[:on_topic_already]
        contents = [item.description]
        contents << item.title if options[:check_page_title]
        controller = zoom_class_controller(item.class.name)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method check_viewing_public_version_of has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def check_viewing_public_version_of(item, options = {})
        unless options[:on_topic_already]
          visit "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}"
          body_should_not_contain "Private version" unless item.has_private_version?
          options[:on_topic_already] = true
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method check_viewing_private_version_of has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def check_viewing_private_version_of(item, options = {})
        raise "ERROR: #{item.class.name} does not have a private version." unless item.has_private_version?
        unless options[:on_topic_already]
          visit "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}"
          body_should_contain "Private version"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          context "and when the basket has a topic updated" do
            setup do
              @topic = new_topic(
                {
                  :title => 'Recent Topic 2 Title',
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 60..80

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 35.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        context "when homepage topic is updated" do
          setup do
            @topic = new_homepage_topic(
              {
                :title => 'Homepage 3 Title',
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 134..154

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 35.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          context "and when the basket has a topic deleted" do
            setup do
              @topic = new_topic(
                {
                  :title => 'Recent Topic 3 Title',
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 84..100

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 33.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        context "when homepage topic is deleted" do
          setup do
            @topic = new_homepage_topic(
              {
                :title => 'Homepage 4 Title',
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 158..174

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 33.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        contents << "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}/#{controller}/edit/#{item.to_param}" if options[:check_edit_link] || (options[:check_edit_link].nil? && (options[:check_all_links].nil? || options[:check_all_links]))
        contents << "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}/#{controller}/history/#{item.to_param}" if options[:check_history_link] || (options[:check_history_link].nil? && (options[:check_all_links].nil? || options[:check_all_links]))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 474..475
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 476..477

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 32.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        contents << "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}/#{controller}/history/#{item.to_param}" if options[:check_history_link] || (options[:check_history_link].nil? && (options[:check_all_links].nil? || options[:check_all_links]))
        contents.each do |content|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 474..475
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 475..476

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 32.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

        contents << "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}/#{controller}/show/#{item.to_param}" if options[:check_show_link] || (options[:check_show_link].nil? && (options[:check_all_links].nil? || options[:check_all_links]))
        contents << "/#{item.basket.urlified_name}/#{controller}/edit/#{item.to_param}" if options[:check_edit_link] || (options[:check_edit_link].nil? && (options[:check_all_links].nil? || options[:check_all_links]))
    Severity: Minor
    Found in old_test/integration/caching_test.rb and 2 other locations - About 30 mins to fix
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 475..476
    old_test/integration/caching_test.rb on lines 476..477

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 32.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status