kigster/secrets-cipher-base64

View on GitHub

Showing 31 of 31 total issues

Method initialize has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def initialize(opts, stdin = $stdin, stdout = $stdout, stderr = $stderr, kernel = nil)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/sym/application.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Method initialize has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

            def initialize(opts, stdin = $stdin, stdout = $stdout, stderr = $stderr, kernel = nil)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/sym/app/output/base.rb - About 35 mins to fix

      Method initialize has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def initialize(argv, stdin = $stdin, stdout = $stdout, stderr = $stderr, kernel = nil)
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/sym/app/cli.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Method execute has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                def execute
                  retries ||= 0
        
                  the_key = create_key
        
        
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/app/commands/generate_key.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method error has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                def error(exception = nil, message = nil)
                  if self.verbose
                    print 'WARNING: '
                    print message ? message.yellow : ''
                    print exception ? exception.message.red : ''
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/app/password/cache.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method initialize_key_source has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def initialize_key_source
              detect_key_source
              if args.require_key? && !self.key
                log :error, 'Unable to determine the key, which appears to be required with current args'
                raise Sym::Errors::NoPrivateKeyFound, "Private key is required when #{self.action ? "#{self.action.to_s}ypting" : provided_flags.join(', ')}"
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/application.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method validate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

                def validate(key)
                  if key
                    begin
                      decoded = Base64Decoder.new(key).key
                      decoded.length == 32 ? key : nil
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/app/private_key/detector.rb - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def encr(data, key, iv = nil)
                raise Sym::Errors::NoPrivateKeyFound unless key.present?
                raise Sym::Errors::NoDataProvided unless data.present?
                encrypt_data(data, encryption_config.data_cipher, iv) do |cipher_struct|
                  cipher_struct.cipher.key = decode_key(key)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/extensions/instance_methods.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/sym/extensions/instance_methods.rb on lines 36..40

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 30.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def decr(encrypted_data, key, iv = nil)
                raise Sym::Errors::NoPrivateKeyFound unless key.present?
                raise Sym::Errors::NoDataProvided unless encrypted_data.present?
                decrypt_data(encrypted_data, encryption_config.data_cipher, iv) do |cipher_struct|
                  cipher_struct.cipher.key = decode_key(key)
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/extensions/instance_methods.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
        lib/sym/extensions/instance_methods.rb on lines 27..31

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 30.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        module Sym
          module App
            module Commands
              class Decrypt < BaseCommand
                include Sym
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/app/commands/decrypt.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
        lib/sym/app/commands/encrypt.rb on lines 2..15

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 26.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

        module Sym
          module App
            module Commands
              class Encrypt < BaseCommand
                include Sym
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/sym/app/commands/encrypt.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
        lib/sym/app/commands/decrypt.rb on lines 2..15

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 26.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language