File invoice.rb
has 331 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module KillBillClient
module Model
class Invoice < InvoiceAttributes
include KillBillClient::Model::CustomFieldHelper
Class Invoice
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Invoice < InvoiceAttributes
include KillBillClient::Model::CustomFieldHelper
include KillBillClient::Model::TagHelper
include KillBillClient::Model::AuditLogWithHistoryHelper
Method change_plan_dry_run
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change_plan_dry_run(account_id, bundle_id, subscription_id, target_date, product_name, product_category, billing_period, price_list_name,
effective_date, billing_policy, options = {})
Method trigger_invoice_dry_run
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trigger_invoice_dry_run(account_id, target_date, upcoming_invoice_target_date, plugin_property = [], user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method create_subscription_dry_run
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_subscription_dry_run(account_id, bundle_id, target_date, product_name, product_category,
billing_period, price_list_name, options = {})
Method cancel_subscription_dry_run
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cancel_subscription_dry_run(account_id, bundle_id, subscription_id, target_date,
effective_date, billing_policy, options = {})
Method upload_invoice_translation
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_invoice_translation(invoice_translation, locale, delete_if_exists, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method create_migration_invoice
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_migration_invoice(account_id, invoices, target_date, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method upload_catalog_translation
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_catalog_translation(catalog_translation, locale, delete_if_exists, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method upload_invoice_template
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_invoice_template(invoice_template, is_manual_pay, delete_if_exists, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method trigger_invoice_group_run
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trigger_invoice_group_run(account_id, target_date = nil, plugin_property = nil, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method trigger_invoice_dry_run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trigger_invoice_dry_run(account_id, target_date, upcoming_invoice_target_date, plugin_property = [], user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
dry_run = InvoiceDryRunAttributes.new
dry_run.dry_run_type = upcoming_invoice_target_date ? 'UPCOMING_INVOICE' : 'TARGET_DATE'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method trigger_invoice
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trigger_invoice(account_id, target_date, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method retrieve_invoice_group
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_invoice_group(account_id, group_id, with_children_items = false, audit = "NONE", options = {})
Method retrieve_payments_for_invoice
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def retrieve_payments_for_invoice(invoice_id, with_plugin_info = false, with_attempts = false, audit = "NONE", options = {})
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_catalog_translation(catalog_translation, locale, delete_if_exists, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
require_multi_tenant_options!(options, "Uploading a catalog translation is only supported in multi-tenant mode")
params = {}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def upload_invoice_translation(invoice_translation, locale, delete_if_exists, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
require_multi_tenant_options!(options, "Uploading a invoice translation is only supported in multi-tenant mode")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 48.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def void(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
self.class.put "#{Invoice::KILLBILL_API_INVOICES_PREFIX}/#{invoice_id}/voidInvoice",
nil,
{},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def commit(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
self.class.put "#{Invoice::KILLBILL_API_INVOICES_PREFIX}/#{invoice_id}/commitInvoice",
nil,
{},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 32.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def trigger_email_notifications(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
self.class.post "#{KILLBILL_API_INVOICES_PREFIX}/#{invoice_id}/emailNotifications",
{},
{},
{
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76