Method create_entitlement_with_add_on
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_entitlement_with_add_on(entitlements, entitlement_date, billing_date, migrated = false, rename_key_if_exists_and_unused = true, call_completion_sec = nil, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method set_blocking_state
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_blocking_state(state_name, service, is_block_change, is_block_entitlement, is_block_billing, requested_date = nil, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
Method change_plan
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change_plan(input, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil,
requested_date = nil, billing_policy = nil, target_phase_type = nil, call_completion = false, options = {})
Method cancel
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cancel(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, requested_date = nil, entitlementPolicy = nil, billing_policy = nil, use_requested_date_for_billing = nil, options = {})
Method create
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, requested_date = nil, call_completion = false, options = {})
Method cancel
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cancel(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, requested_date = nil, entitlementPolicy = nil, billing_policy = nil, use_requested_date_for_billing = nil, options = {})
params = {}
params[:requestedDate] = requested_date unless requested_date.nil?
params[:billingPolicy] = billing_policy unless billing_policy.nil?
params[:entitlementPolicy] = entitlementPolicy unless entitlementPolicy.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update_quantity
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_quantity(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, effective_from_date = nil, force_new_quantity_with_past_effective_date = nil, options = {})
Method update_bcd
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_bcd(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, effective_from_date = nil, force_past_effective_date = nil, options = {})
Method create_entitlement_with_add_on
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_entitlement_with_add_on(entitlements, entitlement_date, billing_date, migrated = false, rename_key_if_exists_and_unused = true, call_completion_sec = nil, user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
params = {}
params[:entitlementDate] = entitlement_date if entitlement_date
params[:billingDate] = billing_date if billing_date
params[:migrated] = migrated
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update_quantity(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, effective_from_date = nil, force_new_quantity_with_past_effective_date = nil, options = {})
params = {}
params[:effectiveFromDate] = effective_from_date unless effective_from_date.nil?
params[:forceNewQuantityWithPastEffectiveDate] = force_new_quantity_with_past_effective_date unless force_new_quantity_with_past_effective_date.nil?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update_bcd(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, effective_from_date = nil, force_past_effective_date = nil, options = {})
params = {}
params[:effectiveFromDate] = effective_from_date unless effective_from_date.nil?
params[:forceNewBcdWithPastEffectiveDate] = force_past_effective_date unless force_past_effective_date.nil?
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 53.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def undo_change_plan(user = nil, reason = nil, comment = nil, options = {})
self.class.put "#{KILLBILL_API_ENTITLEMENT_PREFIX}/#{subscription_id}/undoChangePlan",
{},
{},
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76