korolvs/thatsaboy

View on GitHub
api/app/infrastructure/core/validator/uri_validator.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
1 hr
Test Coverage

Cyclomatic complexity for validate_each is too high. [7/6]
Open

  def validate_each(record, attribute, value)
    return if value.nil?
    uri = URI.parse(value)
    raise unless uri.scheme && uri.host && uri
    unless %w(http https).include?(uri.scheme)

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Method validate_each has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def validate_each(record, attribute, value)
    return if value.nil?
    uri = URI.parse(value)
    raise unless uri.scheme && uri.host && uri
    unless %w(http https).include?(uri.scheme)
Severity: Minor
Found in api/app/infrastructure/core/validator/uri_validator.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Favor modifier unless usage when having a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flow &&/||.
Open

    unless %w(http https).include?(uri.scheme)

Checks for if and unless statements that would fit on one line if written as a modifier if/unless. The maximum line length is configured in the Metrics/LineLength cop.

Example:

# bad
if condition
  do_stuff(bar)
end

unless qux.empty?
  Foo.do_something
end

# good
do_stuff(bar) if condition
Foo.do_something unless qux.empty?

%w-literals should be delimited by [ and ].
Open

    unless %w(http https).include?(uri.scheme)

This cop enforces the consistent usage of %-literal delimiters.

Specify the 'default' key to set all preferred delimiters at once. You can continue to specify individual preferred delimiters to override the default.

Example:

# Style/PercentLiteralDelimiters:
#   PreferredDelimiters:
#     default: '[]'
#     '%i':    '()'

# good
%w[alpha beta] + %i(gamma delta)

# bad
%W(alpha #{beta})

# bad
%I(alpha beta)

Avoid rescuing without specifying an error class.
Open

  rescue

This cop checks for rescuing StandardError. There are two supported styles implicit and explicit. This cop will not register an offense if any error other than StandardError is specified.

Example: EnforcedStyle: implicit

# `implicit` will enforce using `rescue` instead of
# `rescue StandardError`.

# bad
begin
  foo
rescue StandardError
  bar
end

# good
begin
  foo
rescue
  bar
end

# good
begin
  foo
rescue OtherError
  bar
end

# good
begin
  foo
rescue StandardError, SecurityError
  bar
end

Example: EnforcedStyle: explicit (default)

# `explicit` will enforce using `rescue StandardError`
# instead of `rescue`.

# bad
begin
  foo
rescue
  bar
end

# good
begin
  foo
rescue StandardError
  bar
end

# good
begin
  foo
rescue OtherError
  bar
end

# good
begin
  foo
rescue StandardError, SecurityError
  bar
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status