Showing 4 of 4 total issues
Method restore has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def restore
if tag == 'deleted'
attrs = modifications
class_name = attrs['type'].blank? ? versioned_type : attrs['type']- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method changes_between has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def changes_between(from, to)
from_number, to_number = versions.number_at(from), versions.number_at(to)
return {} if from_number == to_number
chain = versions.between(from_number, to_number).reject(&:initial?)
return {} if chain.empty?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method number_at has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def number_at(value)
case value
when Date, Time then (v = at(value)) ? v.number : 1
when Numeric then value.floor
when String, Symbol then (v = at(value)) ? v.number : nil- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method between has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def between(from, to)
from_number, to_number = number_at(from), number_at(to)
return [] if from_number.nil? || to_number.nil?
condition = (from_number == to_number) ? to_number : Range.new(*[from_number, to_number].sort)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"