Function encode_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.encode_types = function encode_types(item, type) {
try {
let value;
if (type == "u8") {
integer_validity_check(item);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function encode_types
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.encode_types = function encode_types(item, type) {
try {
let value;
if (type == "u8") {
integer_validity_check(item);
Function decode_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.decode_types = function decode_types(item, type) {
try {
let value;
if (type == "u8") {
return decode_unsigned(item, 0xff);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function decode_types
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
exports.decode_types = function decode_types(item, type) {
try {
let value;
if (type == "u8") {
return decode_unsigned(item, 0xff);
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (type.includes(item)) {
value = type.indexOf(item);
if (value != undefined) {
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 2);
}
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (value < type.length) {
return type[value];
}
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return (item == true) ? ("1") : ("0");
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return null;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return type[value];
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return "";
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 8);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return value;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 8);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 2);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return decode_signed(item, 0x100000000);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return value;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return "";
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 4);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return value;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return "";
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return value;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return str1 + to_padded_hex_string(value, 8);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return "";
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return "";
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return (item == "1") ? (true) : (false);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return decode_signed(item, 0x10000);
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return null;
Function decode_signed
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function decode_signed(item, capacity) {
let reHex = /^[\dA-Fa-f]{1,}$/;
if (reHex.test(item) == true) {
let value = parseInt(item, 16);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if (type == "i8") {
integer_validity_check(item);
value = clamp(item, -0x80, 0x7F);
value = (value < 0) ? (value + 0x100) : (value);
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 2);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if (type == "i16") {
integer_validity_check(item);
value = clamp(item, -0x8000, 0x7FFF);
value = (value < 0) ? (value + 0x10000) : (value);
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 4);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if (type == "i32") {
integer_validity_check(item);
value = clamp(item, -0x80000000, 0x7FFFFFFF);
value = (value < 0) ? (value + 0x100000000) : (value);
return to_padded_hex_string(value, 8);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76