lib/treat/workers/formatters/visualizers/dot.rb
Method to_dot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 110 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def self.to_dot(entity, options)
# Filter out specified types.
match_types = lambda do |t1, t2s|
f = false
t2s.each { |t2| f = true if Treat::Entities.match_types[t1][t2] }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_dot
has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def self.to_dot(entity, options)
# Filter out specified types.
match_types = lambda do |t1, t2s|
f = false
t2s.each { |t2| f = true if Treat::Entities.match_types[t1][t2] }
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
v = v.to_s if v.is_a?(DateTime)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
v = v ? v.inspect : ' -- '
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
elsif value.is_a?(Hash)
label << "\\n#{feature}: \\n\{ "
value.each do |k,v|
v = v ? v.inspect : ' -- '
v = escape(v)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
v = "*#{v.id}" if v.is_a?(Treat::Entities::Entity)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
Open
label = label[0..-4] unless label[-2] == '{'