File proxy.go
has 586 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package idl
import (
"fmt"
Function generateObjectInterface
has 86 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func generateObjectInterface(itf *InterfaceType, serviceName string,
file *jen.File) error {
definitions := make([]jen.Code, 0)
Function generateProxyType
has 79 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func generateProxyType(file *jen.File, serviceName, ProxyName string,
itf *InterfaceType) {
file.Comment(ProxyName + " implements " + objName(serviceName))
if ProxyName == proxyName("Object") || ProxyName == proxyName("ServiceZero") {
Function methodBodyBlock2
has 71 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func methodBodyBlock2(method Method, params *signature.TupleType,
ret signature.Type) (*Statement, error) {
writing := []jen.Code{}
if ret.Signature() == "v" {
writing = append(writing, jen.Var().Id("ret").Struct())
Function generateObjectInterface
has 11 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func generateObjectInterface(itf *InterfaceType, serviceName string,
file *jen.File) error {
definitions := make([]jen.Code, 0)
Function generateProxyObject
has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func generateProxyObject(itf *InterfaceType, serviceName string,
file *jen.File) error {
proxyName := proxyName(serviceName)
generateProxyType(file, serviceName, proxyName, itf)
Function generatePropertyDef
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func generatePropertyDef(file *jen.File, serviceName string,
property Property, getMethodName, setMethodName,
subscribeMethodName string, definitions *[]jen.Code) error {
Function generateMethodDef
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func generateMethodDef(file *jen.File, serviceName string,
method Method, methodName string, definitions *[]jen.Code) error {
Function generateSignalDef
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func generateSignalDef(file *jen.File, serviceName string,
signal Signal, signalName string, definitions *[]jen.Code) error {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ret.Signature() != "v" {
writing = append(writing, jen.If(jen.Err().Op("=").Add(v.Type.Marshal(v.Name, "&buf")).Op(";").Err().Op("!=").Nil()).Block(
jen.Id(`return ret, fmt.Errorf("serialize `+v.Name+`: %s", err)`),
))
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
writing = append(writing, jen.If(jen.Err().Op("=").Add(v.Type.Marshal(v.Name, "&buf")).Op(";").Err().Op("!=").Nil()).Block(
jen.Id(`return fmt.Errorf("serialize `+v.Name+`: %s", err)`),
))
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 115.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76