File entity.rb
has 305 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Maestrano::Connector::Rails::Concerns::Entity
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
module ClassMethods
# ----------------------------------------------
Method get_connec_entities
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_connec_entities(last_synchronization_date = nil)
return [] if @opts[:__skip_connec] || !self.class.can_read_connec?
Maestrano::Connector::Rails::ConnectorLogger.log('info', @organization, "Fetching Connec! #{self.class.connec_entity_name}")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method batch_calls
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def batch_calls(array_with_idmap, proc, connec_entity_name, id_update_only = false)
request_per_call = @opts[:request_per_batch_call] || 50
start = 0
while start < array_with_idmap.size
# Prepare batch request
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method push_entity_to_external
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push_entity_to_external(mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap, external_entity_name)
idmap = mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap[:idmap]
mapped_connec_entity = mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap[:entity]
id_refs_only_connec_entity = mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap[:id_refs_only_connec_entity]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method push_entity_to_external
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push_entity_to_external(mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap, external_entity_name)
idmap = mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap[:idmap]
mapped_connec_entity = mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap[:entity]
id_refs_only_connec_entity = mapped_connec_entity_with_idmap[:id_refs_only_connec_entity]
Method get_connec_entities
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_connec_entities(last_synchronization_date = nil)
return [] if @opts[:__skip_connec] || !self.class.can_read_connec?
Maestrano::Connector::Rails::ConnectorLogger.log('info', @organization, "Fetching Connec! #{self.class.connec_entity_name}")
Method push_entities_to_connec_to
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def push_entities_to_connec_to(mapped_external_entities_with_idmaps, connec_entity_name)
unless @organization.push_to_connec_enabled?(self)
Maestrano::Connector::Rails::ConnectorLogger.log('info', @organization, "#{Maestrano::Connector::Rails::External.external_name}-#{self.class.external_entity_name.pluralize} not sent to Connec! Push disabled or name not found")
return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method batch_calls
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def batch_calls(array_with_idmap, proc, connec_entity_name, id_update_only = false)
request_per_call = @opts[:request_per_batch_call] || 50
start = 0
while start < array_with_idmap.size
# Prepare batch request
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
batch_entities[index][:idmap].update(connec_id: result['body'][self.class.normalize_connec_entity_name(connec_entity_name)]['id'].find { |id| id['provider'] == 'connec' }['id'], last_push_to_connec: Time.now, message: nil) unless id_update_only # id_update_only only apply for 200 as it's doing PUTs
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
batch_entities[index][:idmap].update(connec_id: result['body'][self.class.normalize_connec_entity_name(connec_entity_name)]['id'].find { |id| id['provider'] == 'connec' }['id'], last_push_to_connec: Time.now, message: nil)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76