File ExtcalPersistableObjectHandler.php
has 473 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace XoopsModules\Extcal;
/*
Function insert
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function insert(\XoopsObject $obj, $force = false, $checkObject = true)
{
if (false !== $checkObject) {
if (!\is_object($obj)) {
// var_dump($obj);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function objectToArray
has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function objectToArray($objects, $externalKeys = [], $format = 's')
{
static $cache;
if (!\is_array($externalKeys)) {
$externalKeys = [$externalKeys];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convertResultSet
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function convertResultSet($result, $idAsKey = false, $asObject = true)
{
$ret = [];
while (false !== ($myrow = $this->db->fetchArray($result))) {
$obj = $this->create(false);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method insert
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function insert(\XoopsObject $obj, $force = false, $checkObject = true)
{
if (false !== $checkObject) {
if (!\is_object($obj)) {
// var_dump($obj);
Method objectToArray
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function objectToArray($objects, $externalKeys = [], $format = 's')
{
static $cache;
if (!\is_array($externalKeys)) {
$externalKeys = [$externalKeys];
Method convertResultSet
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function convertResultSet($result, $idAsKey = false, $asObject = true)
{
$ret = [];
while (false !== ($myrow = $this->db->fetchArray($result))) {
$obj = $this->create(false);
Method getSum
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSum(\CriteriaCompo $criteria = null, $sum = '*')
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
Method getMax
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getMax(\CriteriaCompo $criteria = null, $max = '*')
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
Method getCount
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getCount(\CriteriaElement $criteria = null)
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
Function getSum
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSum(\CriteriaCompo $criteria = null, $sum = '*')
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getCount
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getCount(\CriteriaElement $criteria = null)
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getMax
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getMax(\CriteriaCompo $criteria = null, $max = '*')
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getList
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getList(\CriteriaElement $criteria = null, $limit = 0, $start = 0)
{
$ret = [];
if (null === $criteria) {
$criteria = new \CriteriaCompo();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getList
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function getList(\CriteriaElement $criteria = null, $limit = 0, $start = 0)
{
$ret = [];
if (null === $criteria) {
$criteria = new \CriteriaCompo();
Function updateAll
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function updateAll($fieldname, $fieldvalue, \CriteriaElement $criteria = null, $force = false)
{
$setClause = $fieldname . ' = ';
if (\is_numeric($fieldvalue)) {
$setClause .= $fieldvalue;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method __construct
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function __construct(\XoopsDatabase $db, $tablename, $classname, $keyname, $idenfierName = false)
Function deleteById
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function deleteById($id, $force = false) //delete(\XoopsObject $object, $force = false)
{
if (\is_array($this->keyName)) {
$clause = [];
for ($i = 0, $iMax = \count($this->keyName); $i < $iMax; ++$i) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return true;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function getMax(\CriteriaCompo $criteria = null, $max = '*')
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 285.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function getSum(\CriteriaCompo $criteria = null, $sum = '*')
{
$field = '';
$groupby = false;
if (isset($criteria) && null !== $criteria) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 285.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (\is_object($criteria) && \is_subclass_of($criteria, \CriteriaElement::class)) {
$sql .= ' ' . $criteria->renderWhere();
if ('' != $criteria->getSort()) {
$sql .= ' ORDER BY ' . $criteria->getSort() . ' ' . $criteria->getOrder();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (\is_object($criteria) && \is_subclass_of($criteria, \CriteriaElement::class)) {
$sql .= ' ' . $criteria->renderWhere();
if ('' != $criteria->getSort()) {
$sql .= ' ORDER BY ' . $criteria->getSort() . ' ' . $criteria->getOrder();
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 100.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76