File pcltar.lib.php has 1780 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// PhpConcept Library - Tar Module 1.3.1
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// License GNU/GPL - Vincent Blavet - January 2003Function PclTarHandleExtract has a Cognitive Complexity of 211 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtract(
$p_tarname,
$p_file_list,
&$p_list_detail,
$p_mode,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleUpdate has a Cognitive Complexity of 130 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleUpdate($p_tarname, $p_file_list, &$p_list_detail, $p_tar_mode, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleUpdate', "archive='$p_tarname', list, tar_mode=$p_tar_mode");
$v_result = 1;
$v_nb = 0;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarMerge has a Cognitive Complexity of 93 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarMerge($p_tarname, $p_tarname_add, $p_mode = '', $p_mode_add = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarMerge', "tar='$p_tarname', tar_add='$p_tarname_add', mode='$p_mode', mode_add='$p_mode_add'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleDelete has a Cognitive Complexity of 88 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleDelete($p_tarname, $p_file_list, &$p_list_detail, $p_tar_mode)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleDelete', "archive='$p_tarname', list, tar_mode=$p_tar_mode");
$v_result = 1;
$v_nb = 0;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleExtractFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 80 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractFile($p_tar, &$v_header, $p_path, $p_remove_path, $p_tar_mode)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleExtractFile', "archive_descr='$p_tar', path=$p_path, remove_path='$p_remove_path', tar_mode=$p_tar_mode");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleExtract has 237 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtract(
$p_tarname,
$p_file_list,
&$p_list_detail,
$p_mode,Function PclTarHandleAddFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAddFile($p_tar, $p_filename, $p_mode, &$p_header, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleAddFile', "tar='$p_tar', filename='$p_filename', p_mode='$p_mode', add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleUpdate has 201 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleUpdate($p_tarname, $p_file_list, &$p_list_detail, $p_tar_mode, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleUpdate', "archive='$p_tarname', list, tar_mode=$p_tar_mode");
$v_result = 1;
$v_nb = 0;Function PclTarHandleExtractByIndex has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractByIndex(
$p_tar,
&$p_index_current,
$p_index_start,
$p_index_stop,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleAddList has a Cognitive Complexity of 45 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAddList($p_tar, $p_list, $p_mode, &$p_list_detail, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleAddList', "tar='$p_tar', list, mode='$p_mode', add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
$v_header = [];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarMerge has 158 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarMerge($p_tarname, $p_tarname_add, $p_mode = '', $p_mode_add = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarMerge', "tar='$p_tarname', tar_add='$p_tarname_add', mode='$p_mode', mode_add='$p_mode_add'");
$v_result = 1;
Function PclTarHandleAppend has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAppend($p_tarname, $p_list, $p_mode, &$p_list_detail, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleAppend', "tar=$p_tarname, list, mode=$p_mode");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleDelete has 132 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleDelete($p_tarname, $p_file_list, &$p_list_detail, $p_tar_mode)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleDelete', "archive='$p_tarname', list, tar_mode=$p_tar_mode");
$v_result = 1;
$v_nb = 0;Method PclTarHandleExtractFile has 117 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractFile($p_tar, &$v_header, $p_path, $p_remove_path, $p_tar_mode)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleExtractFile', "archive_descr='$p_tar', path=$p_path, remove_path='$p_remove_path', tar_mode=$p_tar_mode");
$v_result = 1;
Function PclTarHandlePathReduction has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandlePathReduction($p_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandlePathReduction', "dir='$p_dir'");
$v_result = '';
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleExtractByIndexList has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractByIndexList(
$p_tarname,
$p_index_string,
&$p_list_detail,
$p_path,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleCreate has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleCreate($p_tarname, $p_list, $p_mode, $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleCreate', "tar=$p_tarname, list, mode=$p_mode, add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
$v_list_detail = [];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandleHeader has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleHeader($p_tar, $p_filename, $p_mode, &$p_header, $p_stored_filename)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleHeader', "tar=$p_tar, file='$p_filename', mode='$p_mode', stored_filename='$p_stored_filename'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleAppend has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAppend($p_tarname, $p_list, $p_mode, &$p_list_detail, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleAppend', "tar=$p_tarname, list, mode=$p_mode");
$v_result = 1;
Method PclTarHandleHeader has 80 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleHeader($p_tar, $p_filename, $p_mode, &$p_header, $p_stored_filename)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleHeader', "tar=$p_tar, file='$p_filename', mode='$p_mode', stored_filename='$p_stored_filename'");
$v_result = 1;
Method PclTarHandleAddFile has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAddFile($p_tar, $p_filename, $p_mode, &$p_header, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleAddFile', "tar='$p_tar', filename='$p_filename', p_mode='$p_mode', add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
Function PclTarExtractIndex has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtractIndex($p_tarname, $p_index, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarExtractIndex', "tar=$p_tarname, index='$p_index', path=$p_path, remove_path='$p_remove_path', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarUpdate has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarUpdate($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_mode = '', $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarUpdate', "tar='$p_tarname', list='$p_filelist', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarExtractList has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtractList($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarExtractList', "tar=$p_tarname, list, path=$p_path, remove_path='$p_remove_path', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarDelete has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarDelete($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarDelete', "tar='$p_tarname', list='$p_filelist', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleExtractByIndex has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractByIndex(
$p_tar,
&$p_index_current,
$p_index_start,
$p_index_stop,Method PclTarHandleAddList has 69 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAddList($p_tar, $p_list, $p_mode, &$p_list_detail, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleAddList', "tar='$p_tar', list, mode='$p_mode', add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
$v_header = [];Method PclTarHandleReadHeader has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleReadHeader($v_binary_data, &$v_header)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleReadHeader', '');
$v_result = 1;
Function PclTarHandleReadHeader has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleReadHeader($v_binary_data, &$v_header)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleReadHeader', '');
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarAddList has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarAddList($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarAddList', "tar=$p_tarname, file=$p_filelist, p_add_dir='$p_add_dir', p_remove_dir='$p_remove_dir', mode=$p_mode");
$v_result = 1;
$p_list_detail = [];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarHandlerDirCheck has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandlerDirCheck($p_dir)
{
$v_result = 1;
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandlerDirCheck', (string)$p_dir);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleExtractByIndexList has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractByIndexList(
$p_tarname,
$p_index_string,
&$p_list_detail,
$p_path,Function PclTarCreate has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarCreate($p_tarname, $p_filelist = '', $p_mode = '', $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarCreate', "tar=$p_tarname, file='$p_filelist', mode=$p_mode, add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleCreate has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleCreate($p_tarname, $p_list, $p_mode, $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleCreate', "tar=$p_tarname, list, mode=$p_mode, add_dir='$p_add_dir', remove_dir='$p_remove_dir'");
$v_result = 1;
$v_list_detail = [];Method PclTarDelete has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarDelete($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarDelete', "tar='$p_tarname', list='$p_filelist', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
Method PclTarUpdate has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarUpdate($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_mode = '', $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarUpdate', "tar='$p_tarname', list='$p_filelist', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
Method PclTarExtractList has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtractList($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarExtractList', "tar=$p_tarname, list, path=$p_path, remove_path='$p_remove_path', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
Method PclTarExtractIndex has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtractIndex($p_tarname, $p_index, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarExtractIndex', "tar=$p_tarname, index='$p_index', path=$p_path, remove_path='$p_remove_path', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
Method PclTarAddList has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarAddList($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarAddList', "tar=$p_tarname, file=$p_filelist, p_add_dir='$p_add_dir', p_remove_dir='$p_remove_dir', mode=$p_mode");
$v_result = 1;
$p_list_detail = [];Method PclTarHandleExtractByIndex has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$p_tar,
&$p_index_current,
$p_index_start,
$p_index_stop,
&$p_list_detail,Function PclTarAdd has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarAdd($p_tarname, $p_filelist)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarAdd', "tar=$p_tarname, file=$p_filelist");
$v_result = 1;
$v_list_detail = [];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarExtract has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtract($p_tarname, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarExtract', "tar='$p_tarname', path='$p_path', remove_path='$p_remove_path', mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function PclTarList has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarList($p_tarname, $p_mode = '')
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarList', "tar=$p_tarname, mode='$p_mode'");
$v_result = 1;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarHandleExtract has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$p_tarname,
$p_file_list,
&$p_list_detail,
$p_mode,
$p_path,Method PclTarHandleAddList has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAddList($p_tar, $p_list, $p_mode, &$p_list_detail, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)Method PclTarHandleExtractByIndexList has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$p_tarname,
$p_index_string,
&$p_list_detail,
$p_path,
$p_remove_path,Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ('/' === mb_substr($v_header['filename'], mb_strlen($p_file_list[$i]), 1)) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, '' . $v_header['filename'] . " is a file in $p_file_list[$i]");
$v_delete_file = true;
}Method PclTarHandleAppend has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAppend($p_tarname, $p_list, $p_mode, &$p_list_detail, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)Method PclTarHandleUpdate has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleUpdate($p_tarname, $p_file_list, &$p_list_detail, $p_tar_mode, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)Method PclTarHandleAddFile has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleAddFile($p_tar, $p_filename, $p_mode, &$p_header, $p_add_dir, $p_remove_dir)Function PclTarHandleExtension has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtension($p_tarname)
{
TrFctStart(__FILE__, __LINE__, 'PclTarHandleExtension', "tar=$p_tarname");
// ----- Look for file extension- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method PclTarExtractList has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtractList($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')Method PclTarHandleCreate has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleCreate($p_tarname, $p_list, $p_mode, $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')Method PclTarUpdate has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarUpdate($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_mode = '', $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')Method PclTarAddList has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarAddList($p_tarname, $p_filelist, $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '', $p_mode = '')Method PclTarHandleExtractFile has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleExtractFile($p_tar, &$v_header, $p_path, $p_remove_path, $p_tar_mode)Method PclTarHandleHeader has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarHandleHeader($p_tar, $p_filename, $p_mode, &$p_header, $p_stored_filename)Method PclTarCreate has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarCreate($p_tarname, $p_filelist = '', $p_mode = '', $p_add_dir = '', $p_remove_dir = '')Method PclTarExtractIndex has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function PclTarExtractIndex($p_tarname, $p_index, $p_path = './', $p_remove_path = '', $p_mode = '')Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $p_list;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $p_list;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $p_list;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $p_list;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return PclErrorCode();Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $v_result;Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (0 == ($v_dest_file = @fopen($v_header['filename'], 'wb'))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'Error while opening ' . $v_header['filename'] . ' in write binary mode');
// ----- Change the file status
$v_header['status'] = 'write_error';- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 505.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (0 == ($v_dest_file = @fopen($v_header['filename'], 'wb'))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'Error while opening ' . $v_header['filename'] . ' in write binary mode');
// ----- Change the file status
$v_header['status'] = 'write_error';- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 505.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ('tar' === $p_tar_mode) {
// ----- Open file
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'Open file in binary read mode');
if (0 == ($v_tar = @fopen($p_tarname, 'rb'))) {
// ----- Error log- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 474.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ('tar' === $p_tar_mode) {
// ----- Open file
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'Open file in binary read mode');
if (0 == ($v_tar = @fopen($p_tarname, 'rb'))) {
// ----- Error log- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 474.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($v_extract_file && (!$v_listing)) {
// ----- Look for path to remove
if (('' != $p_remove_path) && (0 === mb_strpos($v_header['filename'], $p_remove_path))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, "Found path '$p_remove_path' to remove in file " . $v_header['filename'] . '');
// ----- Remove the path- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 251.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($v_extract_file) {
if (1 != ($v_result = PclTarHandleExtractFile($v_tar, $v_header, $p_path, $p_remove_path, $p_tar_mode))) {
// ----- Return
TrFctEnd(__FILE__, __LINE__, $v_result);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 251.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (('./' !== $p_path) && ('/' !== $p_path)) {
// ----- Look for the path end '/'
while ('/' === mb_substr($p_path, -1)) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, "Destination path [$p_path] ends by '/'");
$p_path = mb_substr($p_path, 0, -1);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 173.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (('./' !== $p_path) && ('/' !== $p_path)) {
// ----- Look for the path end '/'
while ('/' === mb_substr($p_path, -1)) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, "Destination path [$p_path] ends by '/'");
$p_path = mb_substr($p_path, 0, -1);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 173.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (file_exists($v_header['filename'])) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'File ' . $v_header['filename'] . ' already exists');
// ----- Look if file is a directory
if (is_dir($v_header['filename'])) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 160.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (file_exists($v_header['filename'])) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'File ' . $v_header['filename'] . ' already exists');
// ----- Look if file is a directory
if (is_dir($v_header['filename'])) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 160.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($v_extract_file && ('5' != $v_header['typeflag'])) {
// ----- Open the destination file in write mode
if (0 == ($v_dest_file = @fopen($v_header['filename'], 'wb'))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'Error while opening ' . $v_header['filename'] . ' in write binary mode');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($v_extract_file && ('5' != $v_header['typeflag'])) {
// ----- Open the destination file in write mode
if (0 == ($v_dest_file = @fopen($v_header['filename'], 'wb'))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'Error while opening ' . $v_header['filename'] . ' in write binary mode');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 151.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((!is_file($p_tarname_add))
|| ((0 != (($v_size_add = filesize($p_tarname_add)) % 512))
&& ('tar' === $p_mode_add))) {
// ----- Error log
if (!is_file($p_tarname_add)) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((!is_file($p_tarname)) || ((0 != (($v_size = filesize($p_tarname)) % 512)) && ('tar' === $p_mode))) {
// ----- Error log
if (!is_file($p_tarname)) {
PclErrorLog(-4, "Archive '$p_tarname' does not exist");
} else {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!gzeof($p_tar)) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'More than one 512 block file');
$i = 1;
// ----- Read new 512 block and write the already read- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!gzeof($p_tar)) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'More than one 512 block file');
$i = 1;
// ----- Read new 512 block and write the already read- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ((!is_file($p_tarname)) || ((0 != (($v_size = filesize($p_tarname)) % 512)) && ('tar' === $p_mode))) {
// ----- Error log
if (!is_file($p_tarname)) {
PclErrorLog(-4, "Archive '$p_tarname' does not exist");
} else {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 149.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ($i = 0; $i < $n; ++$i) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'Read complete 512 bytes block number ' . ($i + 1));
if ('tar' === $p_tar_mode) {
$v_content = fread($v_tar, 512);
fwrite($v_temp_tar, $v_content, 512);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ($j = 0; $j < $n; ++$j) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'Read complete 512 bytes block number ' . ($j + 1));
if ('tar' === $p_tar_mode) {
$v_content = fread($v_tar, 512);
fwrite($v_temp_tar, $v_content, 512);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (('' != $p_remove_path) && (0 === mb_strpos($v_header['filename'], $p_remove_path))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, "Found path '$p_remove_path' to remove in file " . $v_header['filename'] . '');
// ----- Remove the path
$v_header['filename'] = mb_substr($v_header['filename'], $p_remove_path_size);
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'Reslting file is ' . $v_header['filename'] . '');- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 122.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (('' != $p_remove_path) && (0 === mb_strpos($v_header['filename'], $p_remove_path))) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, "Found path '$p_remove_path' to remove in file " . $v_header['filename'] . '');
// ----- Remove the path
$v_header['filename'] = mb_substr($v_header['filename'], $p_remove_path_size);
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 3, 'Resulting file is ' . $v_header['filename'] . '');- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 122.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($v_extract_file) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'Memorize info about file ' . $v_header['filename'] . '');
// ----- Log extracted files
if (($v_file_dir = \dirname($v_header['filename'])) == $v_header['filename']) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($v_listing || $v_extract_file || $v_extraction_stopped) {
TrFctMessage(__FILE__, __LINE__, 2, 'Memorize info about file ' . $v_header['filename'] . '');
// ----- Log extracted files
if (($v_file_dir = \dirname($v_header['filename'])) == $v_header['filename']) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 121.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (1 != ($v_result = PclTarHandleReadHeader($v_binary_data, $v_header))) {
// ----- Close the archive file
if ('tar' === $p_tar_mode) {
fclose($v_tar);
fclose($v_temp_tar);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (1 != ($v_result = PclTarHandleReadHeader($v_binary_data, $v_header))) {
// ----- Close the archive file
if ('tar' === $p_tar_mode) {
fclose($v_tar);
fclose($v_temp_tar);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76