File qunit-1.12.0.js
has 1607 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* QUnit v1.12.0 - A JavaScript Unit Testing Framework
*
* http://qunitjs.com
*
Function jsDump
has 187 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
QUnit.jsDump = (function() {
function quote( str ) {
return "\"" + str.toString().replace( /"/g, "\\\"" ) + "\"";
}
function literal( o ) {
Function equiv
has 147 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
QUnit.equiv = (function() {
// Call the o related callback with the given arguments.
function bindCallbacks( o, callbacks, args ) {
var prop = QUnit.objectType( o );
Function load
has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
QUnit.load = function() {
runLoggingCallbacks( "begin", QUnit, {} );
// Initialize the config, saving the execution queue
var banner, filter, i, label, len, main, ol, toolbar, userAgent, val,
Function diff
has 113 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
QUnit.diff = (function() {
/*jshint eqeqeq:false, eqnull:true */
function diff( o, n ) {
var i,
ns = {},
Function callbacks
has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
callbacks = (function () {
// for string, boolean, number and null
function useStrictEquality( b, a ) {
/*jshint eqeqeq:false */
Function finish
has 89 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
finish: function() {
config.current = this;
if ( config.requireExpects && this.expected === null ) {
QUnit.pushFailure( "Expected number of assertions to be defined, but expect() was not called.", this.stack );
} else if ( this.expected !== null && this.expected !== this.assertions.length ) {
Function diff
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function diff( o, n ) {
var i,
ns = {},
os = {};
Function done
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function done() {
config.autorun = true;
// Log the last module results
if ( config.currentModule ) {
Function init
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function() {
extend( config, {
stats: { all: 0, bad: 0 },
moduleStats: { all: 0, bad: 0 },
started: +new Date(),
Function setup
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setup: function() {
if (
// Emit moduleStart when we're switching from one module to another
this.module !== config.previousModule ||
// They could be equal (both undefined) but if the previousModule property doesn't
Function object
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"object": function( b, a ) {
/*jshint forin:false */
var i, j, loop, aCircular, bCircular,
// Default to true
eq = true,
Function push
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
push: function( result, actual, expected, message ) {
if ( !config.current ) {
throw new Error( "assertion outside test context, was " + sourceFromStacktrace() );
}
Function array
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"array": function( b, a ) {
var i, j, len, loop, aCircular, bCircular;
// b could be an object literal here
if ( QUnit.objectType( b ) !== "array" ) {
Function start
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
start: function( count ) {
// QUnit hasn't been initialized yet.
// Note: RequireJS (et al) may delay onLoad
if ( config.semaphore === undefined ) {
QUnit.begin(function() {
Function throws
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"throws": function( block, expected, message ) {
var actual,
expectedOutput = expected,
ok = false;
Function extractStacktrace
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function extractStacktrace( e, offset ) {
offset = offset === undefined ? 3 : offset;
var stack, include, i;
Function typeOf
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
typeOf: function( obj ) {
var type;
if ( obj === null ) {
type = "null";
} else if ( typeof obj === "undefined" ) {
Function pushFailure
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
pushFailure: function( message, source, actual ) {
if ( !config.current ) {
throw new Error( "pushFailure() assertion outside test context, was " + sourceFromStacktrace(2) );
}
Function objectType
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
objectType: function( obj ) {
if ( typeof obj === "undefined" ) {
return "undefined";
// consider: typeof null === object
}
Function queue
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
queue: function() {
var bad,
test = this;
synchronize(function() {
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return "object";
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return !include;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return include;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return errorString;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return undefined;
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return e.sourceURL + ":" + e.line;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( n[i].text != null && n[ i - 1 ].text == null && n[i].row > 0 && o[ n[i].row - 1 ].text == null &&
n[ i - 1 ] == o[ n[i].row - 1 ]) {
n[ i - 1 ] = {
text: n[ i - 1 ],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 104.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( n[i].text != null && n[ i + 1 ].text == null && n[i].row + 1 < o.length && o[ n[i].row + 1 ].text == null &&
n[ i + 1 ] == o[ n[i].row + 1 ] ) {
n[ i + 1 ] = {
text: n[ i + 1 ],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 104.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( i = 0; i < o.length; i++ ) {
if ( !hasOwn.call( os, o[i] ) ) {
os[ o[i] ] = {
rows: [],
n: null
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for ( i = 0; i < n.length; i++ ) {
if ( !hasOwn.call( ns, n[i] ) ) {
ns[ n[i] ] = {
rows: [],
o: null
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
this.testEnvironment.setup.call( this.testEnvironment, QUnit.assert );
} catch( e ) {
QUnit.pushFailure( "Setup failed on " + this.testName + ": " + ( e.message || e ), extractStacktrace( e, 1 ) );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 83.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
this.testEnvironment.teardown.call( this.testEnvironment, QUnit.assert );
} catch( e ) {
QUnit.pushFailure( "Teardown failed on " + this.testName + ": " + ( e.message || e ), extractStacktrace( e, 1 ) );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 83.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
function inArray( elem, array ) {
if ( array.indexOf ) {
return array.indexOf( elem );
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 81.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( config.currentModule ) {
runLoggingCallbacks( "moduleDone", QUnit, {
name: config.currentModule,
failed: config.moduleStats.bad,
passed: config.moduleStats.all - config.moduleStats.bad,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ( hasOwn.call( config, "previousModule" ) ) {
runLoggingCallbacks( "moduleDone", QUnit, {
name: config.previousModule,
failed: config.moduleStats.bad,
passed: config.moduleStats.all - config.moduleStats.bad,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
o[ os[i].rows[0] ] = {
text: o[ os[i].rows[0] ],
row: ns[i].rows[0]
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
n[ ns[i].rows[0] ] = {
text: n[ ns[i].rows[0] ],
row: os[i].rows[0]
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 62.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76