mangroveorg/datawinners

View on GitHub
datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.withoutdrilldown.js

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 mos
Test Coverage

File daterangepicker.jQuery.withoutdrilldown.js has 473 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open


jQuery.fn.daterangepicker = function(settings){
    var rangeInput = jQuery(this);
    
    //defaults

    Function daterangepicker has 170 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    jQuery.fn.daterangepicker = function(settings){
        var rangeInput = jQuery(this);
        
        //defaults
        var options = jQuery.extend({

      Function daterangepicker has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      jQuery.fn.daterangepicker = function(settings){
          var rangeInput = jQuery(this);
          
          //defaults
          var options = jQuery.extend({

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function TimeSpan has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      var TimeSpan = function (days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {
          var attrs = "days hours minutes seconds milliseconds".split(/\s+/);
          
          var gFn = function (attr) { 
              return function () { 

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Function TimeSpan has 130 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      var TimeSpan = function (days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {
          var attrs = "days hours minutes seconds milliseconds".split(/\s+/);
          
          var gFn = function (attr) { 
              return function () { 

        Function TimePeriod has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        var TimePeriod = function (years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {
            var attrs = "years months days hours minutes seconds milliseconds".split(/\s+/);
            
            var gFn = function (attr) { 
                return function () { 

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function TimePeriod has 70 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        var TimePeriod = function (years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {
            var attrs = "years months days hours minutes seconds milliseconds".split(/\s+/);
            
            var gFn = function (attr) { 
                return function () { 

          Function set has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

          return true;};Date.validateMillisecond=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,999,"milliseconds");};Date.validateSecond=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,59,"seconds");};Date.validateMinute=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,59,"minutes");};Date.validateHour=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,23,"hours");};Date.validateDay=function(n,year,month){return Date._validate(n,1,Date.getDaysInMonth(year,month),"days");};Date.validateMonth=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,11,"months");};Date.validateYear=function(n){return Date._validate(n,1,9999,"seconds");};Date.prototype.set=function(config){var x=config;if(!x.millisecond&&x.millisecond!==0){x.millisecond=-1;}
          if(!x.second&&x.second!==0){x.second=-1;}
          if(!x.minute&&x.minute!==0){x.minute=-1;}
          if(!x.hour&&x.hour!==0){x.hour=-1;}
          if(!x.day&&x.day!==0){x.day=-1;}

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Function toString has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              this.toString = function (format) {
                  this._toString = function () {
                      if (this.getDays() !== null && this.getDays() > 0) {
                          return this.getDays() + "." + this.getHours() + ":" + this.p(this.getMinutes()) + ":" + this.p(this.getSeconds());
                      }

            Function compareTo has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            return null;};Date.prototype.clone=function(){return new Date(this.getTime());};Date.prototype.compareTo=function(date){if(isNaN(this)){throw new Error(this);}
            if(date instanceof Date&&!isNaN(date)){return(this>date)?1:(this<date)?-1:0;}else{throw new TypeError(date);}};Date.prototype.equals=function(date){return(this.compareTo(date)===0);};Date.prototype.between=function(start,end){var t=this.getTime();return t>=start.getTime()&&t<=end.getTime();};Date.prototype.addMilliseconds=function(value){this.setMilliseconds(this.getMilliseconds()+value);return this;};Date.prototype.addSeconds=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*1000);};Date.prototype.addMinutes=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*60000);};Date.prototype.addHours=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*3600000);};Date.prototype.addDays=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*86400000);};Date.prototype.addWeeks=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*604800000);};Date.prototype.addMonths=function(value){var n=this.getDate();this.setDate(1);this.setMonth(this.getMonth()+value);this.setDate(Math.min(n,this.getDaysInMonth()));return this;};Date.prototype.addYears=function(value){return this.addMonths(value*12);};Date.prototype.add=function(config){if(typeof config=="number"){this._orient=config;return this;}

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function add has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            if(date instanceof Date&&!isNaN(date)){return(this>date)?1:(this<date)?-1:0;}else{throw new TypeError(date);}};Date.prototype.equals=function(date){return(this.compareTo(date)===0);};Date.prototype.between=function(start,end){var t=this.getTime();return t>=start.getTime()&&t<=end.getTime();};Date.prototype.addMilliseconds=function(value){this.setMilliseconds(this.getMilliseconds()+value);return this;};Date.prototype.addSeconds=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*1000);};Date.prototype.addMinutes=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*60000);};Date.prototype.addHours=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*3600000);};Date.prototype.addDays=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*86400000);};Date.prototype.addWeeks=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*604800000);};Date.prototype.addMonths=function(value){var n=this.getDate();this.setDate(1);this.setMonth(this.getMonth()+value);this.setDate(Math.min(n,this.getDaysInMonth()));return this;};Date.prototype.addYears=function(value){return this.addMonths(value*12);};Date.prototype.add=function(config){if(typeof config=="number"){this._orient=config;return this;}
            var x=config;if(x.millisecond||x.milliseconds){this.addMilliseconds(x.millisecond||x.milliseconds);}
            if(x.second||x.seconds){this.addSeconds(x.second||x.seconds);}
            if(x.minute||x.minutes){this.addMinutes(x.minute||x.minutes);}
            if(x.hour||x.hours){this.addHours(x.hour||x.hours);}

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Function TimePeriod has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            var TimePeriod = function (years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {

              Function TimeSpan has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

              var TimeSpan = function (days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                var _vector=function(op){return function(){if(arguments[0]instanceof Array){return op.apply(null,arguments[0]);}else{return op.apply(null,arguments);}};};var vx="each any all".split(/\s/);for(var j=0;j<vx.length;j++){_[vx[j]]=_vector(_[vx[j]]);}}());(function(){var flattenAndCompact=function(ax){var rx=[];for(var i=0;i<ax.length;i++){if(ax[i]instanceof Array){rx=rx.concat(flattenAndCompact(ax[i]));}else{if(ax[i]){rx.push(ax[i]);}}}
                return rx;};Date.Grammar={};Date.Translator={hour:function(s){return function(){this.hour=Number(s);};},minute:function(s){return function(){this.minute=Number(s);};},second:function(s){return function(){this.second=Number(s);};},meridian:function(s){return function(){this.meridian=s.slice(0,1).toLowerCase();};},timezone:function(s){return function(){var n=s.replace(/[^\d\+\-]/g,"");if(n.length){this.timezoneOffset=Number(n);}else{this.timezone=s.toLowerCase();}};},day:function(x){var s=x[0];return function(){this.day=Number(s.match(/\d+/)[0]);};},month:function(s){return function(){this.month=((s.length==3)?Date.getMonthNumberFromName(s):(Number(s)-1));};},year:function(s){return function(){var n=Number(s);this.year=((s.length>2)?n:(n+(((n+2000)<Date.CultureInfo.twoDigitYearMax)?2000:1900)));};},rday:function(s){return function(){switch(s){case"yesterday":this.days=-1;break;case"tomorrow":this.days=1;break;case"today":this.days=0;break;case"now":this.days=0;this.now=true;break;}};},finishExact:function(x){x=(x instanceof Array)?x:[x];var now=new Date();this.year=now.getFullYear();this.month=now.getMonth();this.day=1;this.hour=0;this.minute=0;this.second=0;for(var i=0;i<x.length;i++){if(x[i]){x[i].call(this);}}
                this.hour=(this.meridian=="p"&&this.hour<13)?this.hour+12:this.hour;if(this.day>Date.getDaysInMonth(this.year,this.month)){throw new RangeError(this.day+" is not a valid value for days.");}
                var r=new Date(this.year,this.month,this.day,this.hour,this.minute,this.second);if(this.timezone){r.set({timezone:this.timezone});}else if(this.timezoneOffset){r.set({timezoneOffset:this.timezoneOffset});}
                return r;},finish:function(x){x=(x instanceof Array)?flattenAndCompact(x):[x];if(x.length===0){return null;}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 492..512
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 475..495

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 4445.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                (function(){Date.Parsing={Exception:function(s){this.message="Parse error at '"+s.substring(0,10)+" ...'";}};var $P=Date.Parsing;var _=$P.Operators={rtoken:function(r){return function(s){var mx=s.match(r);if(mx){return([mx[0],s.substring(mx[0].length)]);}else{throw new $P.Exception(s);}};},token:function(s){return function(s){return _.rtoken(new RegExp("^\s*"+s+"\s*"))(s);};},stoken:function(s){return _.rtoken(new RegExp("^"+s));},until:function(p){return function(s){var qx=[],rx=null;while(s.length){try{rx=p.call(this,s);}catch(e){qx.push(rx[0]);s=rx[1];continue;}
                break;}
                return[qx,s];};},many:function(p){return function(s){var rx=[],r=null;while(s.length){try{r=p.call(this,s);}catch(e){return[rx,s];}
                rx.push(r[0]);s=r[1];}
                return[rx,s];};},optional:function(p){return function(s){var r=null;try{r=p.call(this,s);}catch(e){return[null,s];}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 458..492
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 441..475

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 3086.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                var TimeSpan = function (days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {
                    var attrs = "days hours minutes seconds milliseconds".split(/\s+/);
                    
                    var gFn = function (attr) { 
                        return function () { 
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 532..688
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 515..671

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 1902.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                var TimePeriod = function (years, months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, milliseconds) {
                    var attrs = "years months days hours minutes seconds milliseconds".split(/\s+/);
                    
                    var gFn = function (attr) { 
                        return function () { 
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 702..786
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 685..769

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 860.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return true;};Date.validateMillisecond=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,999,"milliseconds");};Date.validateSecond=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,59,"seconds");};Date.validateMinute=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,59,"minutes");};Date.validateHour=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,23,"hours");};Date.validateDay=function(n,year,month){return Date._validate(n,1,Date.getDaysInMonth(year,month),"days");};Date.validateMonth=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,11,"months");};Date.validateYear=function(n){return Date._validate(n,1,9999,"seconds");};Date.prototype.set=function(config){var x=config;if(!x.millisecond&&x.millisecond!==0){x.millisecond=-1;}
                if(!x.second&&x.second!==0){x.second=-1;}
                if(!x.minute&&x.minute!==0){x.minute=-1;}
                if(!x.hour&&x.hour!==0){x.hour=-1;}
                if(!x.day&&x.day!==0){x.day=-1;}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 433..449
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 416..432

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 778.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return w;};Date.prototype.isDST=function(){return this.toString().match(/(E|C|M|P)(S|D)T/)[2]=="D";};Date.prototype.getTimezone=function(){return Date.getTimezoneAbbreviation(this.getUTCOffset,this.isDST());};Date.prototype.setTimezoneOffset=function(s){var here=this.getTimezoneOffset(),there=Number(s)*-6/10;this.addMinutes(there-here);return this;};Date.prototype.setTimezone=function(s){return this.setTimezoneOffset(Date.getTimezoneOffset(s));};Date.prototype.getUTCOffset=function(){var n=this.getTimezoneOffset()*-10/6,r;if(n<0){r=(n-10000).toString();return r[0]+r.substr(2);}else{r=(n+10000).toString();return"+"+r.substr(1);}};Date.prototype.getDayName=function(abbrev){return abbrev?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedDayNames[this.getDay()]:Date.CultureInfo.dayNames[this.getDay()];};Date.prototype.getMonthName=function(abbrev){return abbrev?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedMonthNames[this.getMonth()]:Date.CultureInfo.monthNames[this.getMonth()];};Date.prototype._toString=Date.prototype.toString;Date.prototype.toString=function(format){var self=this;var p=function p(s){return(s.toString().length==1)?"0"+s:s;};return format?format.replace(/dd?d?d?|MM?M?M?|yy?y?y?|hh?|HH?|mm?|ss?|tt?|zz?z?/g,function(format){switch(format){case"hh":return p(self.getHours()<13?self.getHours():(self.getHours()-12));case"h":return self.getHours()<13?self.getHours():(self.getHours()-12);case"HH":return p(self.getHours());case"H":return self.getHours();case"mm":return p(self.getMinutes());case"m":return self.getMinutes();case"ss":return p(self.getSeconds());case"s":return self.getSeconds();case"yyyy":return self.getFullYear();case"yy":return self.getFullYear().toString().substring(2,4);case"dddd":return self.getDayName();case"ddd":return self.getDayName(true);case"dd":return p(self.getDate());case"d":return self.getDate().toString();case"MMMM":return self.getMonthName();case"MMM":return self.getMonthName(true);case"MM":return p((self.getMonth()+1));case"M":return self.getMonth()+1;case"t":return self.getHours()<12?Date.CultureInfo.amDesignator.substring(0,1):Date.CultureInfo.pmDesignator.substring(0,1);case"tt":return self.getHours()<12?Date.CultureInfo.amDesignator:Date.CultureInfo.pmDesignator;case"zzz":case"zz":case"z":return"";}}):this._toString();};
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 451..451
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 434..434

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 584.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                Date.now=function(){return new Date();};Date.today=function(){return Date.now().clearTime();};Date.prototype._orient=+1;Date.prototype.next=function(){this._orient=+1;return this;};Date.prototype.last=Date.prototype.prev=Date.prototype.previous=function(){this._orient=-1;return this;};Date.prototype._is=false;Date.prototype.is=function(){this._is=true;return this;};Number.prototype._dateElement="day";Number.prototype.fromNow=function(){var c={};c[this._dateElement]=this;return Date.now().add(c);};Number.prototype.ago=function(){var c={};c[this._dateElement]=this*-1;return Date.now().add(c);};(function(){var $D=Date.prototype,$N=Number.prototype;var dx=("sunday monday tuesday wednesday thursday friday saturday").split(/\s/),mx=("january february march april may june july august september october november december").split(/\s/),px=("Millisecond Second Minute Hour Day Week Month Year").split(/\s/),de;var df=function(n){return function(){if(this._is){this._is=false;return this.getDay()==n;}
                return this.moveToDayOfWeek(n,this._orient);};};for(var i=0;i<dx.length;i++){$D[dx[i]]=$D[dx[i].substring(0,3)]=df(i);}
                var mf=function(n){return function(){if(this._is){this._is=false;return this.getMonth()===n;}
                return this.moveToMonth(n,this._orient);};};for(var j=0;j<mx.length;j++){$D[mx[j]]=$D[mx[j].substring(0,3)]=mf(j);}
                var ef=function(j){return function(){if(j.substring(j.length-1)!="s"){j+="s";}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 452..457
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 435..440

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 567.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                Date.CultureInfo={name:"en-US",englishName:"English (United States)",nativeName:"English (United States)",dayNames:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],abbreviatedDayNames:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],shortestDayNames:["Su","Mo","Tu","We","Th","Fr","Sa"],firstLetterDayNames:["S","M","T","W","T","F","S"],monthNames:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],abbreviatedMonthNames:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"],amDesignator:"AM",pmDesignator:"PM",firstDayOfWeek:0,twoDigitYearMax:2029,dateElementOrder:"mdy",formatPatterns:{shortDate:"M/d/yyyy",longDate:"dddd, MMMM dd, yyyy",shortTime:"h:mm tt",longTime:"h:mm:ss tt",fullDateTime:"dddd, MMMM dd, yyyy h:mm:ss tt",sortableDateTime:"yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ss",universalSortableDateTime:"yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ssZ",rfc1123:"ddd, dd MMM yyyy HH:mm:ss GMT",monthDay:"MMMM dd",yearMonth:"MMMM, yyyy"},regexPatterns:{jan:/^jan(uary)?/i,feb:/^feb(ruary)?/i,mar:/^mar(ch)?/i,apr:/^apr(il)?/i,may:/^may/i,jun:/^jun(e)?/i,jul:/^jul(y)?/i,aug:/^aug(ust)?/i,sep:/^sep(t(ember)?)?/i,oct:/^oct(ober)?/i,nov:/^nov(ember)?/i,dec:/^dec(ember)?/i,sun:/^su(n(day)?)?/i,mon:/^mo(n(day)?)?/i,tue:/^tu(e(s(day)?)?)?/i,wed:/^we(d(nesday)?)?/i,thu:/^th(u(r(s(day)?)?)?)?/i,fri:/^fr(i(day)?)?/i,sat:/^sa(t(urday)?)?/i,future:/^next/i,past:/^last|past|prev(ious)?/i,add:/^(\+|after|from)/i,subtract:/^(\-|before|ago)/i,yesterday:/^yesterday/i,today:/^t(oday)?/i,tomorrow:/^tomorrow/i,now:/^n(ow)?/i,millisecond:/^ms|milli(second)?s?/i,second:/^sec(ond)?s?/i,minute:/^min(ute)?s?/i,hour:/^h(ou)?rs?/i,week:/^w(ee)?k/i,month:/^m(o(nth)?s?)?/i,day:/^d(ays?)?/i,year:/^y((ea)?rs?)?/i,shortMeridian:/^(a|p)/i,longMeridian:/^(a\.?m?\.?|p\.?m?\.?)/i,timezone:/^((e(s|d)t|c(s|d)t|m(s|d)t|p(s|d)t)|((gmt)?\s*(\+|\-)\s*\d\d\d\d?)|gmt)/i,ordinalSuffix:/^\s*(st|nd|rd|th)/i,timeContext:/^\s*(\:|a|p)/i},abbreviatedTimeZoneStandard:{GMT:"-000",EST:"-0400",CST:"-0500",MST:"-0600",PST:"-0700"},abbreviatedTimeZoneDST:{GMT:"-000",EDT:"-0500",CDT:"-0600",MDT:"-0700",PDT:"-0800"}};
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 419..419
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 402..402

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 466.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    if(options.arrows && rangeInput.size()==1){
                        var prevLink = jQuery('<a href="#" class="ui-daterangepicker-prev ui-corner-all" title="'+ options.prevLinkText +'"><span class="ui-icon ui-icon-circle-triangle-w">'+ options.prevLinkText +'</span></a>');
                        var nextLink = jQuery('<a href="#" class="ui-daterangepicker-next ui-corner-all" title="'+ options.nextLinkText +'"><span class="ui-icon ui-icon-circle-triangle-e">'+ options.nextLinkText +'</span></a>');
                        jQuery(this)
                        .addClass('ui-rangepicker-input ui-widget-content')
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 366..396
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 349..379

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 432.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                if(date instanceof Date&&!isNaN(date)){return(this>date)?1:(this<date)?-1:0;}else{throw new TypeError(date);}};Date.prototype.equals=function(date){return(this.compareTo(date)===0);};Date.prototype.between=function(start,end){var t=this.getTime();return t>=start.getTime()&&t<=end.getTime();};Date.prototype.addMilliseconds=function(value){this.setMilliseconds(this.getMilliseconds()+value);return this;};Date.prototype.addSeconds=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*1000);};Date.prototype.addMinutes=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*60000);};Date.prototype.addHours=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*3600000);};Date.prototype.addDays=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*86400000);};Date.prototype.addWeeks=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*604800000);};Date.prototype.addMonths=function(value){var n=this.getDate();this.setDate(1);this.setMonth(this.getMonth()+value);this.setDate(Math.min(n,this.getDaysInMonth()));return this;};Date.prototype.addYears=function(value){return this.addMonths(value*12);};Date.prototype.add=function(config){if(typeof config=="number"){this._orient=config;return this;}
                var x=config;if(x.millisecond||x.milliseconds){this.addMilliseconds(x.millisecond||x.milliseconds);}
                if(x.second||x.seconds){this.addSeconds(x.second||x.seconds);}
                if(x.minute||x.minutes){this.addMinutes(x.minute||x.minutes);}
                if(x.hour||x.hours){this.addHours(x.hour||x.hours);}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 424..432
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 407..415

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 352.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return this;};Date.prototype.clearTime=function(){this.setHours(0);this.setMinutes(0);this.setSeconds(0);this.setMilliseconds(0);return this;};Date.prototype.isLeapYear=function(){var y=this.getFullYear();return(((y%4===0)&&(y%100!==0))||(y%400===0));};Date.prototype.isWeekday=function(){return!(this.is().sat()||this.is().sun());};Date.prototype.getDaysInMonth=function(){return Date.getDaysInMonth(this.getFullYear(),this.getMonth());};Date.prototype.moveToFirstDayOfMonth=function(){return this.set({day:1});};Date.prototype.moveToLastDayOfMonth=function(){return this.set({day:this.getDaysInMonth()});};Date.prototype.moveToDayOfWeek=function(day,orient){var diff=(day-this.getDay()+7*(orient||+1))%7;return this.addDays((diff===0)?diff+=7*(orient||+1):diff);};Date.prototype.moveToMonth=function(month,orient){var diff=(month-this.getMonth()+12*(orient||+1))%12;return this.addMonths((diff===0)?diff+=12*(orient||+1):diff);};Date.prototype.getDayOfYear=function(){return Math.floor((this-new Date(this.getFullYear(),0,1))/86400000);};Date.prototype.getWeekOfYear=function(firstDayOfWeek){var y=this.getFullYear(),m=this.getMonth(),d=this.getDate();var dow=firstDayOfWeek||Date.CultureInfo.firstDayOfWeek;var offset=7+1-new Date(y,0,1).getDay();if(offset==8){offset=1;}
                var daynum=((Date.UTC(y,m,d,0,0,0)-Date.UTC(y,0,1,0,0,0))/86400000)+1;var w=Math.floor((daynum-offset+7)/7);if(w===dow){y--;var prevOffset=7+1-new Date(y,0,1).getDay();if(prevOffset==2||prevOffset==8){w=53;}else{w=52;}}
                return w;};Date.prototype.isDST=function(){return this.toString().match(/(E|C|M|P)(S|D)T/)[2]=="D";};Date.prototype.getTimezone=function(){return Date.getTimezoneAbbreviation(this.getUTCOffset,this.isDST());};Date.prototype.setTimezoneOffset=function(s){var here=this.getTimezoneOffset(),there=Number(s)*-6/10;this.addMinutes(there-here);return this;};Date.prototype.setTimezone=function(s){return this.setTimezoneOffset(Date.getTimezoneOffset(s));};Date.prototype.getUTCOffset=function(){var n=this.getTimezoneOffset()*-10/6,r;if(n<0){r=(n-10000).toString();return r[0]+r.substr(2);}else{r=(n+10000).toString();return"+"+r.substr(1);}};Date.prototype.getDayName=function(abbrev){return abbrev?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedDayNames[this.getDay()]:Date.CultureInfo.dayNames[this.getDay()];};Date.prototype.getMonthName=function(abbrev){return abbrev?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedMonthNames[this.getMonth()]:Date.CultureInfo.monthNames[this.getMonth()];};Date.prototype._toString=Date.prototype.toString;Date.prototype.toString=function(format){var self=this;var p=function p(s){return(s.toString().length==1)?"0"+s:s;};return format?format.replace(/dd?d?d?|MM?M?M?|yy?y?y?|hh?|HH?|mm?|ss?|tt?|zz?z?/g,function(format){switch(format){case"hh":return p(self.getHours()<13?self.getHours():(self.getHours()-12));case"h":return self.getHours()<13?self.getHours():(self.getHours()-12);case"HH":return p(self.getHours());case"H":return self.getHours();case"mm":return p(self.getMinutes());case"m":return self.getMinutes();case"ss":return p(self.getSeconds());case"s":return self.getSeconds();case"yyyy":return self.getFullYear();case"yy":return self.getFullYear().toString().substring(2,4);case"dddd":return self.getDayName();case"ddd":return self.getDayName(true);case"dd":return p(self.getDate());case"d":return self.getDate().toString();case"MMMM":return self.getMonthName();case"MMM":return self.getMonthName(true);case"MM":return p((self.getMonth()+1));case"M":return self.getMonth()+1;case"t":return self.getHours()<12?Date.CultureInfo.amDesignator.substring(0,1):Date.CultureInfo.pmDesignator.substring(0,1);case"tt":return self.getHours()<12?Date.CultureInfo.amDesignator:Date.CultureInfo.pmDesignator;case"zzz":case"zz":case"z":return"";}}):this._toString();};
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 449..451
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 432..434

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 280.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return-1;};Date.getDayNumberFromName=function(name){var n=Date.CultureInfo.dayNames,m=Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedDayNames,o=Date.CultureInfo.shortestDayNames,s=name.toLowerCase();for(var i=0;i<n.length;i++){if(n[i].toLowerCase()==s||m[i].toLowerCase()==s){return i;}}
                return-1;};Date.isLeapYear=function(year){return(((year%4===0)&&(year%100!==0))||(year%400===0));};Date.getDaysInMonth=function(year,month){return[31,(Date.isLeapYear(year)?29:28),31,30,31,30,31,31,30,31,30,31][month];};Date.getTimezoneOffset=function(s,dst){return(dst||false)?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneDST[s.toUpperCase()]:Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneStandard[s.toUpperCase()];};Date.getTimezoneAbbreviation=function(offset,dst){var n=(dst||false)?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneDST:Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneStandard,p;for(p in n){if(n[p]===offset){return p;}}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 421..422
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 404..405

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 146.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                Date.getMonthNumberFromName=function(name){var n=Date.CultureInfo.monthNames,m=Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedMonthNames,s=name.toLowerCase();for(var i=0;i<n.length;i++){if(n[i].toLowerCase()==s||m[i].toLowerCase()==s){return i;}}
                return-1;};Date.getDayNumberFromName=function(name){var n=Date.CultureInfo.dayNames,m=Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedDayNames,o=Date.CultureInfo.shortestDayNames,s=name.toLowerCase();for(var i=0;i<n.length;i++){if(n[i].toLowerCase()==s||m[i].toLowerCase()==s){return i;}}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 420..421
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 403..404

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 133.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return((r[1].length===0)?r[0]:null);};Date.getParseFunction=function(fx){var fn=Date.Grammar.formats(fx);return function(s){var r=null;try{r=fn.call({},s);}catch(e){return null;}
                return((r[1].length===0)?r[0]:null);};};Date.parseExact=function(s,fx){return Date.getParseFunction(fx)(s);};
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 514..515
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 497..498

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 111.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    function fDate(date){
                       if(!date.getDate()){return '';}
                       var day = date.getDate();
                       var month = date.getMonth();
                       var year = date.getFullYear();
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 152..160
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 152..160

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 108.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return g._start.call({},s);};}());Date._parse=Date.parse;Date.parse=function(s){var r=null;if(!s){return null;}
                try{r=Date.Grammar.start.call({},s);}catch(e){return null;}
                return((r[1].length===0)?r[0]:null);};Date.getParseFunction=function(fx){var fn=Date.Grammar.formats(fx);return function(s){var r=null;try{r=fn.call({},s);}catch(e){return null;}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 512..514
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 495..497

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 103.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return null;};Date.prototype.clone=function(){return new Date(this.getTime());};Date.prototype.compareTo=function(date){if(isNaN(this)){throw new Error(this);}
                if(date instanceof Date&&!isNaN(date)){return(this>date)?1:(this<date)?-1:0;}else{throw new TypeError(date);}};Date.prototype.equals=function(date){return(this.compareTo(date)===0);};Date.prototype.between=function(start,end){var t=this.getTime();return t>=start.getTime()&&t<=end.getTime();};Date.prototype.addMilliseconds=function(value){this.setMilliseconds(this.getMilliseconds()+value);return this;};Date.prototype.addSeconds=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*1000);};Date.prototype.addMinutes=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*60000);};Date.prototype.addHours=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*3600000);};Date.prototype.addDays=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*86400000);};Date.prototype.addWeeks=function(value){return this.addMilliseconds(value*604800000);};Date.prototype.addMonths=function(value){var n=this.getDate();this.setDate(1);this.setMonth(this.getMonth()+value);this.setDate(Math.min(n,this.getDaysInMonth()));return this;};Date.prototype.addYears=function(value){return this.addMonths(value*12);};Date.prototype.add=function(config){if(typeof config=="number"){this._orient=config;return this;}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 423..424
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 406..407

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 96.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return this;};Date._validate=function(value,min,max,name){if(typeof value!="number"){throw new TypeError(value+" is not a Number.");}else if(value<min||value>max){throw new RangeError(value+" is not a valid value for "+name+".");}
                return true;};Date.validateMillisecond=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,999,"milliseconds");};Date.validateSecond=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,59,"seconds");};Date.validateMinute=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,59,"minutes");};Date.validateHour=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,23,"hours");};Date.validateDay=function(n,year,month){return Date._validate(n,1,Date.getDaysInMonth(year,month),"days");};Date.validateMonth=function(n){return Date._validate(n,0,11,"months");};Date.validateYear=function(n){return Date._validate(n,1,9999,"seconds");};Date.prototype.set=function(config){var x=config;if(!x.millisecond&&x.millisecond!==0){x.millisecond=-1;}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 432..433
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 415..416

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 86.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return-1;};Date.isLeapYear=function(year){return(((year%4===0)&&(year%100!==0))||(year%400===0));};Date.getDaysInMonth=function(year,month){return[31,(Date.isLeapYear(year)?29:28),31,30,31,30,31,31,30,31,30,31][month];};Date.getTimezoneOffset=function(s,dst){return(dst||false)?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneDST[s.toUpperCase()]:Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneStandard[s.toUpperCase()];};Date.getTimezoneAbbreviation=function(offset,dst){var n=(dst||false)?Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneDST:Date.CultureInfo.abbreviatedTimeZoneStandard,p;for(p in n){if(n[p]===offset){return p;}}
                return null;};Date.prototype.clone=function(){return new Date(this.getTime());};Date.prototype.compareTo=function(date){if(isNaN(this)){throw new Error(this);}
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 422..423
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 405..406

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 84.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    jQuery.fn.restoreDateFromData = function(){
                        if(jQuery(this).data('saveDate')){
                            jQuery(this).datepicker('setDate', jQuery(this).data('saveDate')).removeData('saveDate'); 
                        }
                        return this;
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 163..168
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 163..168

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 78.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    jQuery.fn.saveDateToData = function(){
                        if(!jQuery(this).data('saveDate')){
                            jQuery(this).data('saveDate', jQuery(this).datepicker('getDate') );
                        }
                        return this;
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 169..174
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 169..174

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 74.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                return this["add"+j](this._orient);};};var nf=function(n){return function(){this._dateElement=n;return this;};};for(var k=0;k<px.length;k++){de=px[k].toLowerCase();$D[de]=$D[de+"s"]=ef(px[k]);$N[de]=$N[de+"s"]=nf(de);}}());Date.prototype.toJSONString=function(){return this.toString("yyyy-MM-ddThh:mm:ssZ");};Date.prototype.toShortDateString=function(){return this.toString(Date.CultureInfo.formatPatterns.shortDatePattern);};Date.prototype.toLongDateString=function(){return this.toString(Date.CultureInfo.formatPatterns.longDatePattern);};Date.prototype.toShortTimeString=function(){return this.toString(Date.CultureInfo.formatPatterns.shortTimePattern);};Date.prototype.toLongTimeString=function(){return this.toString(Date.CultureInfo.formatPatterns.longTimePattern);};Date.prototype.getOrdinal=function(){switch(this.getDate()){case 1:case 21:case 31:return"st";case 2:case 22:return"nd";case 3:case 23:return"rd";default:return"th";}};
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 457..457
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 440..440

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 73.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                Date.prototype.getTimeOfDay = function () {
                    return new TimeSpan(0, this.getHours(), this.getMinutes(), this.getSeconds(), this.getMilliseconds());
                };
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 694..696
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 677..679

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 63.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    function showRP(){
                        if(rp.data('state') == 'closed'){ 
                            rp.data('state', 'open');
                            rp.fadeIn(300);
                            options.onOpen(); 
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 177..183
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 177..183

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 62.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    function hideRP(){
                        if(rp.data('state') == 'open'){ 
                            rp.data('state', 'closed');
                            rp.fadeOut(300);
                            options.onClose(); 
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.custom.js on lines 184..190
                datawinners/media/javascript/dateRangePicker/js/daterangepicker.jQuery.js on lines 184..190

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 60.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status