Showing 401 of 401 total issues
json Gem for Ruby Unsafe Object Creation Vulnerability (additional fix) Open
json (2.1.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2020-10663
Criticality: High
URL: https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/03/19/json-dos-cve-2020-10663/
Solution: upgrade to >= 2.3.0
Sinatra vulnerable to Reflected File Download attack Open
sinatra (2.0.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-45442
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/security/advisories/GHSA-2x8x-jmrp-phxw
Solution: upgrade to ~> 2.2.3, >= 3.0.4
ReDoS based DoS vulnerability in Action Dispatch Open
actionpack (5.1.3)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2023-22792
URL: https://github.com/rails/rails/releases/tag/v7.0.4.1
Solution: upgrade to >= 5.2.8.15, ~> 5.2.8, >= 6.1.7.1, ~> 6.1.7, >= 7.0.4.1
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in Loofah Open
loofah (2.0.3)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-23514
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/flavorjones/loofah/security/advisories/GHSA-486f-hjj9-9vhh
Solution: upgrade to >= 2.19.1
Unsafe objects can be loaded from Redis Open
redis-store (1.3.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2017-1000248
Criticality: Critical
URL: https://github.com/redis-store/redis-store/commit/ce13252c26fcc40ed4935c9abfeb0ee0761e5704
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.4.0
sinatra does not validate expanded path matches Open
sinatra (2.0.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2022-29970
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/pull/1683
Solution: upgrade to >= 2.2.0
Assignment Branch Condition size for call is too high. [23.62/15] Open
def call(channel)
feed = download(channel.feed_url)
if feed.description.present? && channel.description.nil?
channel.description = feed.description
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def call(channel)
feed = download(channel.feed_url)
if feed.description.present? && channel.description.nil?
channel.description = feed.description
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def call(title, summary, description, url, published_at, channel)
episode = Episode.where(published_at: published_at, channel_id: channel.id).first
if episode.present?
episode.update!(title: title,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for call is too high. [8/6] Open
def call(channel)
feed = download(channel.feed_url)
if feed.description.present? && channel.description.nil?
channel.description = feed.description
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for call is too high. [8/7] Open
def call(channel)
feed = download(channel.feed_url)
if feed.description.present? && channel.description.nil?
channel.description = feed.description
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Block has too many lines. [34/25] Open
namespace :episodes do
paginate per_page: 10
get do
page, per_page = params[:page], params[:per_page]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(channel)
feed = download(channel.feed_url)
if feed.description.present? && channel.description.nil?
channel.description = feed.description
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Denial of Service Vulnerability in Action View Open
actionview (5.1.3)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2019-5419
Criticality: High
URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/GN7w9fFAQeI
Solution: upgrade to >= 6.0.0.beta3, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11
Nokogiri gem, via libxml, is affected by DoS and RCE vulnerabilities Open
nokogiri (1.8.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2017-9050
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/sparklemotion/nokogiri/issues/1673
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.8.1
Path Traversal in Sprockets Open
sprockets (3.7.1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2018-3760
Criticality: High
URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ruby-security-ann/2S9Pwz2i16k
Solution: upgrade to < 3.0.0, >= 2.12.5, < 4.0.0, >= 3.7.2, >= 4.0.0.beta8
ruby-ffi DDL loading issue on Windows OS Open
ffi (1.9.18)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2018-1000201
Criticality: High
URL: https://github.com/ffi/ffi/releases/tag/1.9.24
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.9.24
XSS vulnerability in rails-html-sanitizer Open
rails-html-sanitizer (1.0.3)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2018-3741
URL: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyonrails-security/tP7W3kLc5u4/uDy2Br7xBgAJ
Solution: upgrade to >= 1.0.4
File Content Disclosure in Action View Open
actionview (5.1.3)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2019-5418
Criticality: High
URL: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/rubyonrails-security/pFRKI96Sm8Q
Solution: upgrade to >= 4.2.11.1, ~> 4.2.11, >= 5.0.7.2, ~> 5.0.7, >= 5.1.6.2, ~> 5.1.6, >= 5.2.2.1, ~> 5.2.2, >= 6.0.0.beta3
Path traversal is possible via backslash characters on Windows. Open
rack-protection (2.0.0)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Advisory: CVE-2018-7212
URL: https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/pull/1379
Solution: upgrade to >= 2.0.1, ~> 1.5.4