Showing 40 of 40 total issues
Method set_mode_from_integer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def set_mode_from_integer(mode)
@readable = @writable = @append = false
case mode & (IO::RDONLY | IO::WRONLY | IO::RDWR)
when IO::RDONLY
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method <<
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def <<(row)
@lines += 1
if !row.is_a?(Row)
row = Row.new(self, row, @lines)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method convread
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convread(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NumericConversion.new, &block)
Method ungetbyte
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ungetbyte(bytes)
raise(IOError, "not opened for reading") unless @readable
return nil if bytes == nil
bytes = bytes.chr if bytes.kind_of?(Fixnum)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse(io, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)
Method out
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def out(data, mode = 'w', quot = '"', sep = ',', quotenum = false, &block)
Method read
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
table << row unless row.empty?
Method parse_headers
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_headers(data, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)
Method headers
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def headers(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
row << column.convert(false) unless column.empty? && endline
Method ungetc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ungetc(chars)
raise(IOError, "not opened for reading") unless @readable
return nil if chars == nil
chars = chars.chr if chars.kind_of?(Fixnum)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(data, quot = '"', sep = ',', quotenum = false, &block)
Method append
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def append(data, quot = '"', sep = ',', quotenum = false, &block)
Method truncate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def truncate(len)
raise(IOError, "closing non-duplex IO for writing") unless @writable
raise(TypeError) unless len.respond_to?(:to_int)
length = len.to_int
raise(Errno::EINVAL, "negative length") if (length < 0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method <<
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def <<(ch)
if ch == ?-.ord
@float = @int = size == 0
elsif (ch > ?9.ord || ch < ?0.ord) && ch != ?..ord
@int = @float = false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method define_mode
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def define_mode(mode=nil)
if mode == nil
# default modes
@string.frozen? ? set_mode_from_string("r") : set_mode_from_string("r+")
elsif mode.is_a?(Integer)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method print
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def print(*args)
raise IOError, "not opened for writing" unless @writable
args << $_ if args.empty?
args.map! { |x| (x == nil) ? "nil" : x }
write((args << $\).flatten.join)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def read(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NoConversion.new, &block)
File.open(file, 'r') do |io|
parse(io, quot, sep, fail_on_malformed, column, &block)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def convread(file, quot = '"', sep = ',', fail_on_malformed = true, column = NumericConversion.new, &block)
File.open(file, 'r') do |io|
parse(io, quot, sep, fail_on_malformed, column, &block)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76