Sign upLogin

mashirozx/mastodon

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 1,785 of 1,785 total issues

Method verify_account! has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def verify_account!
    return unless @json['signature'].is_a?(Hash)

    type        = @json['signature']['type']
    creator_uri = @json['signature']['creator']
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/activitypub/linked_data_signature.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method unique_tag_to_local_id has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def unique_tag_to_local_id(tag, expected_type)
    return nil unless local_id?(tag)

    if ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.local_uri?(tag)
      ActivityPub::TagManager.instance.uri_to_local_id(tag)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/ostatus/tag_manager.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method valid_url_or_nil has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def valid_url_or_nil(str, same_origin_only: false)
    return if str.blank? || str == 'null'

    url = @original_url + Addressable::URI.parse(str)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/lib/link_details_extractor.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method make has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def make
      return File.open(@file.path) unless needs_convert?

      if options[:geometry]
        min_side = [@current_geometry.width, @current_geometry.height].min.to_i
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/paperclip/lazy_thumbnail.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method remove has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def remove(*domains)
      if domains.empty?
        say('No domain(s) given', :red)
        exit(1)
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mastodon/email_domain_blocks_cli.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method remove_statuses has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def remove_statuses
      return if options[:skip_status_remove]

      say('Creating temporary database indices...')
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mastodon/statuses_cli.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_column_with_default has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def add_column_with_default(table, column, type, default:, limit: nil, allow_null: false, &block)
      if transaction_open?
        raise 'add_column_with_default can not be run inside a transaction, ' \
          'you can disable transactions by calling disable_ddl_transaction! ' \
          'in the body of your migration class'
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mastodon/migration_helpers.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method stoplight_wrap_request has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def stoplight_wrap_request(domain, &block)
    if domain.present?
      Stoplight("source:#{domain}", &block)
        .with_fallback { nil }
        .with_threshold(1)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/workers/import/relationship_worker.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method perform has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def perform(id)
    account = Account.find_by(id: id)
    return if account.nil? || account.local?

    ActivityPub::FetchRemoteAccountService.new.call(account.uri)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/workers/remote_account_refresh_worker.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method remove has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def remove(*addresses)
      if addresses.empty?
        say('No IP(s) given', :red)
        exit(1)
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mastodon/ip_blocks_cli.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method inboxes has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def inboxes
    return @inboxes if defined?(@inboxes)

    @inboxes = [@status.mentions, @status.reblogs, @status.preloadable_poll.votes].flat_map do |relation|
      relation.includes(:account).map do |record|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/workers/activitypub/distribute_poll_update_worker.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method recount has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def recount(type)
      case type
      when 'accounts'
        processed, = parallelize_with_progress(Account.local.includes(:account_stat)) do |account|
          account_stat                 = account.account_stat
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mastodon/cache_cli.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_timestamps_with_timezone has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def add_timestamps_with_timezone(table_name, **options)
      options[:null] = false if options[:null].nil?

      [:created_at, :updated_at].each do |column_name|
        if options[:default] && transaction_open?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/mastodon/migration_helpers.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method carry_mutes_over! has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def carry_mutes_over!
    @source_account.muted_by_relationships.where(account: Account.local).find_each do |mute|
      MuteService.new.call(mute.account, @target_account, notifications: mute.hide_notifications) unless mute.account.muting?(@target_account) || mute.account.following?(@target_account)
      add_account_note_if_needed!(mute.account, 'move_handler.carry_mutes_over_text')
    rescue => e
Severity: Minor
Found in app/workers/move_worker.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method carry_blocks_over! has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def carry_blocks_over!
    @source_account.blocked_by_relationships.where(account: Account.local).find_each do |block|
      unless block.account.blocking?(@target_account) || block.account.following?(@target_account)
        BlockService.new.call(block.account, @target_account)
        add_account_note_if_needed!(block.account, 'move_handler.carry_blocks_over_text')
Severity: Minor
Found in app/workers/move_worker.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  included do
    # Avatar upload
    has_attached_file :avatar, styles: ->(f) { avatar_styles(f) }, convert_options: { all: '-strip' }, processors: [:lazy_thumbnail]
    validates_attachment_content_type :avatar, content_type: IMAGE_MIME_TYPES
    validates_attachment_size :avatar, less_than: LIMIT
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/concerns/account_avatar.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
app/models/concerns/account_header.rb on lines 20..26

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 35.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  included do
    # Header upload
    has_attached_file :header, styles: ->(f) { header_styles(f) }, convert_options: { all: '-strip' }, processors: [:lazy_thumbnail]
    validates_attachment_content_type :header, content_type: IMAGE_MIME_TYPES
    validates_attachment_size :header, less_than: LIMIT
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/concerns/account_header.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
app/models/concerns/account_avatar.rb on lines 19..25

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 35.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    begin
      @account.avatar_remote_url = image_url('icon') || '' unless skip_download?
      @account.avatar = nil if @account.avatar_remote_url.blank?
    rescue Mastodon::UnexpectedResponseError, HTTP::TimeoutError, HTTP::ConnectionError, OpenSSL::SSL::SSLError
      RedownloadAvatarWorker.perform_in(rand(30..600).seconds, @account.id)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/services/activitypub/process_account_service.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
app/services/activitypub/process_account_service.rb on lines 112..116

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 35.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    begin
      @account.header_remote_url = image_url('image') || '' unless skip_download?
      @account.header = nil if @account.header_remote_url.blank?
    rescue Mastodon::UnexpectedResponseError, HTTP::TimeoutError, HTTP::ConnectionError, OpenSSL::SSL::SSLError
      RedownloadHeaderWorker.perform_in(rand(30..600).seconds, @account.id)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/services/activitypub/process_account_service.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
app/services/activitypub/process_account_service.rb on lines 106..110

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 35.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 9 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  handleDeleteClick = () => {
    this.props.onDelete(this.props.status, this.context.router.history);
  }
Severity: Major
Found in app/javascript/mastodon/features/status/components/action_bar.js and 8 other locations - About 35 mins to fix
app/javascript/mastodon/components/status_action_bar.js on lines 143..145
app/javascript/mastodon/components/status_action_bar.js on lines 147..149
app/javascript/mastodon/components/status_action_bar.js on lines 155..157
app/javascript/mastodon/features/account_timeline/components/header.js on lines 42..44
app/javascript/mastodon/features/account_timeline/components/header.js on lines 46..48
app/javascript/mastodon/features/direct_timeline/components/conversation.js on lines 91..93
app/javascript/mastodon/features/status/components/action_bar.js on lines 92..94
app/javascript/mastodon/features/status/components/action_bar.js on lines 112..114

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 46.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language