Function getLogger
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getLogger(string $logfile): Logger
{
if (!isset($this->loggers[$logfile])) {
$logger = new Logger();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getLogger
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function getLogger(string $logfile): Logger
{
if (!isset($this->loggers[$logfile])) {
$logger = new Logger();
Function log
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function log(int $prio, $msg, $logfile = null): void
{
if (is_null($logfile)) {
$logfile = self::LOGFILE_DEFAULT;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
The method getLogger() has a Cyclomatic Complexity of 18. The configured cyclomatic complexity threshold is 10. Open
private function getLogger(string $logfile): Logger
{
if (!isset($this->loggers[$logfile])) {
$logger = new Logger();
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
CyclomaticComplexity
Since: 0.1
Complexity is determined by the number of decision points in a method plus one for the method entry. The decision points are 'if', 'while', 'for', and 'case labels'. Generally, 1-4 is low complexity, 5-7 indicates moderate complexity, 8-10 is high complexity, and 11+ is very high complexity.
Example
// Cyclomatic Complexity = 11
class Foo {
1 public function example() {
2 if ($a == $b) {
3 if ($a1 == $b1) {
fiddle();
4 } elseif ($a2 == $b2) {
fiddle();
} else {
fiddle();
}
5 } elseif ($c == $d) {
6 while ($c == $d) {
fiddle();
}
7 } elseif ($e == $f) {
8 for ($n = 0; $n < $h; $n++) {
fiddle();
}
} else {
switch ($z) {
9 case 1:
fiddle();
break;
10 case 2:
fiddle();
break;
11 case 3:
fiddle();
break;
default:
fiddle();
break;
}
}
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/codesize.html#cyclomaticcomplexity
Avoid using empty try-catch blocks in log. Open
catch (\Exception $ex) {
}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
EmptyCatchBlock
Since: 2.7.0
Usually empty try-catch is a bad idea because you are silently swallowing an error condition and then continuing execution. Occasionally this may be the right thing to do, but often it's a sign that a developer saw an exception, didn't know what to do about it, and so used an empty catch to silence the problem.
Example
class Foo {
public function bar()
{
try {
// ...
} catch (Exception $e) {} // empty catch block
}
}
Source https://phpmd.org/rules/design.html#emptycatchblock
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try {
if ($msg instanceof \Exception) {
$msg = $msg->getMessage() . PHP_EOL . $msg->getTraceAsString();
$logfile = self::LOGFILE_EXCEPTION;
} elseif (is_object($msg)) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 112.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Expected 1 newline at end of file; 0 found Open
}
- Exclude checks
Expected 1 space after closing brace; newline found Open
}
- Exclude checks