mceachen/closure_tree

View on GitHub

Showing 12 of 12 total issues

Method has_closure_tree_root has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def has_closure_tree_root(assoc_name, options = {})
       options[:class_name] ||= assoc_name.to_s.sub(/\Aroot_/, "").classify
      options[:foreign_key] ||= self.name.underscore << "_id"

      has_one assoc_name, -> { where(parent: nil) }, **options
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/closure_tree/has_closure_tree_root.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method has_closure_tree_root has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def has_closure_tree_root(assoc_name, options = {})
       options[:class_name] ||= assoc_name.to_s.sub(/\Aroot_/, "").classify
      options[:foreign_key] ||= self.name.underscore << "_id"

      has_one assoc_name, -> { where(parent: nil) }, **options
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/closure_tree/has_closure_tree_root.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method rebuild! has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def rebuild!(called_by_rebuild = false)
          _ct.with_advisory_lock do
            delete_hierarchy_references unless (defined? @was_new_record) && @was_new_record
            hierarchy_class.create!(:ancestor => self, :descendant => self, :generations => 0)
            unless root?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/closure_tree/hierarchy_maintenance.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method add_sibling has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def add_sibling(sibling, add_after = true)
          fail "can't add self as sibling" if self == sibling
    
          if _ct.dont_order_roots && parent.nil?
            raise ClosureTree::RootOrderingDisabledError.new("Root ordering is disabled on this model")
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/closure_tree/numeric_deterministic_ordering.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method add_sibling has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def add_sibling(sibling, add_after = true)
            fail "can't add self as sibling" if self == sibling
      
            if _ct.dont_order_roots && parent.nil?
              raise ClosureTree::RootOrderingDisabledError.new("Root ordering is disabled on this model")
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/closure_tree/numeric_deterministic_ordering.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method has_closure_tree has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def has_closure_tree(options = {})
            options.assert_valid_keys(
              :parent_column_name,
              :dependent,
              :hierarchy_class_name,
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/closure_tree/has_closure_tree.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def with_descendant(*descendants)
                descendant_ids = descendants.map { |ea| ea.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Base) ? ea._ct_id : ea }
                scope = descendant_ids.blank? ? all : joins(:descendant_hierarchies).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.descendant_id" => descendant_ids).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.generations > 0").
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/closure_tree/finders.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
        lib/closure_tree/finders.rb on lines 84..90

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 41.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def with_ancestor(*ancestors)
                ancestor_ids = ancestors.map { |ea| ea.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Base) ? ea._ct_id : ea }
                scope = ancestor_ids.blank? ? all : joins(:ancestor_hierarchies).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.ancestor_id" => ancestor_ids).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.generations > 0").
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/closure_tree/finders.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
        lib/closure_tree/finders.rb on lines 93..99

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 41.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Method has_closure_tree has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def has_closure_tree(options = {})
              options.assert_valid_keys(
                :parent_column_name,
                :dependent,
                :hierarchy_class_name,
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/closure_tree/has_closure_tree.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method build_ancestry_attr_path has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def build_ancestry_attr_path(path, attributes)
              path = path.is_a?(Array) ? path.dup : [path]
              unless path.first.is_a?(Hash)
                if subclass? && has_inheritance_column?
                  attributes = attributes.with_indifferent_access
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/closure_tree/support.rb - About 45 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method with_descendant has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def with_descendant(*descendants)
                descendant_ids = descendants.map { |ea| ea.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Base) ? ea._ct_id : ea }
                scope = descendant_ids.blank? ? all : joins(:descendant_hierarchies).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.descendant_id" => descendant_ids).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.generations > 0").
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/closure_tree/finders.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method with_ancestor has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

              def with_ancestor(*ancestors)
                ancestor_ids = ancestors.map { |ea| ea.is_a?(ActiveRecord::Base) ? ea._ct_id : ea }
                scope = ancestor_ids.blank? ? all : joins(:ancestor_hierarchies).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.ancestor_id" => ancestor_ids).
                  where("#{_ct.hierarchy_table_name}.generations > 0").
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/closure_tree/finders.rb - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Severity
        Category
        Status
        Source
        Language