Showing 353 of 412 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
atten_decoder[i][j][1] = self.decoder_att[i][-j - 1](torch.cat((g_upsampl[j], atten_decoder[i][j][0]), dim=1))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
atten_decoder[i][j][1] = self.decoder_att[i][-j - 1](torch.cat((g_upsampl[j], atten_decoder[i][j][0]), dim=1))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 88.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File searchtools.js
has 381 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* searchtools.js
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*
* Sphinx JavaScript utilities for the full-text search.
Function defaultPrefilter
has 122 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function defaultPrefilter( elem, props, opts ) {
var prop, value, toggle, hooks, oldfire, propTween, restoreDisplay, display,
isBox = "width" in props || "height" in props,
anim = this,
orig = {},
Function query
has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
query : function(query) {
var i;
// stem the searchterms and add them to the correct list
var stemmer = new Stemmer();
Function Callbacks
has 121 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
jQuery.Callbacks = function( options ) {
// Convert options from String-formatted to Object-formatted if needed
// (we check in cache first)
options = typeof options === "string" ?
Function DataloaderSC
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def DataloaderSC(lang_list,
model_name_or_path,
model_type,
mode_list,
data_dir,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _keep_fused_form
has a Cognitive Complexity of 31 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _keep_fused_form(self,posPreferenceDicts):
# For a span A,B and external tokens C, such as A > B > C, we have to
# Make A the head of the span
# Attach C-level tokens to A
#Remove B-level tokens, which are the subtokens of the fused form della: de la
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
task_dict = {'segmentation': {'metrics':['mIoU', 'pixAcc'],
'metrics_fn': SegMetric(),
'loss_fn': SegLoss(),
'weight': [1, 1]},
'depth': {'metrics':['abs_err', 'rel_err'],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 79.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
task_dict = {'segmentation': {'metrics':['mIoU', 'pixAcc'],
'metrics_fn': SegMetric(),
'loss_fn': SegLoss(),
'weight': [1, 1]},
'depth': {'metrics':['abs_err', 'rel_err'],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 79.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function stemWord
has 109 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
this.stemWord = function (w) {
var stem;
var suffix;
var firstch;
var origword = w;
Function then
has 102 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
then: function( onFulfilled, onRejected, onProgress ) {
var maxDepth = 0;
function resolve( depth, deferred, handler, special ) {
return function() {
var that = this,
Function read_conll_u
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_conll_u(self,filename,keepFusedForm=False, lang=None, posPreferenceDict=None):
sentences = []
sent = DependencyTree()
multi_tokens = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Animation
has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function Animation( elem, properties, options ) {
var result,
stopped,
index = 0,
length = Animation.prefilters.length,
Function trigger
has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
trigger: function( event, data, elem, onlyHandlers ) {
var i, cur, tmp, bubbleType, ontype, handle, special, lastElement,
eventPath = [ elem || document ],
type = hasOwn.call( event, "type" ) ? event.type : event,
Function forward
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def forward(self, x):
g_encoder, g_decoder, g_maxpool, g_upsampl, indices = ([0] * 5 for _ in range(5))
for i in range(5):
g_encoder[i], g_decoder[-i - 1] = ([0] * 2 for _ in range(2))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function convert_examples_to_features_sc
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def convert_examples_to_features_sc(
examples,
tokenizer,
max_length=512,
label_list=None,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function xnli_preprocess
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xnli_preprocess(args):
def _preprocess_file(infile, output_dir, split):
all_langs = defaultdict(list)
for i, line in enumerate(open(infile, 'r')):
if i == 0:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function CHILD
has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"CHILD": function( type, what, _argument, first, last ) {
var simple = type.slice( 0, 3 ) !== "nth",
forward = type.slice( -4 ) !== "last",
ofType = what === "of-type";
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
atten_decoder[i][j][0] = self.decoder_block_att[-j - 1](atten_decoder[i][j][0])
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76