Class has too many lines. [223/150] Open
class Fresh < BaseFresh
def argsapi call , *args
sbuf =[*args[0]]
hash = Hash===args[-1] && args[-1]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length a class exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Class Fresh
has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Fresh < BaseFresh
def argsapi call , *args
sbuf =[*args[0]]
hash = Hash===args[-1] && args[-1]
File fresh-mc.rb
has 365 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'rubinius/actor'
include Math
module Enumerable
Assignment Branch Condition size for argsapi is too high. [46.88/20] Open
def argsapi call , *args
sbuf =[*args[0]]
hash = Hash===args[-1] && args[-1]
rt = args[2] ||
( call[/bcast|scatter|scatterv/] && hash && hash[:from]) ||
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for calldev is too high. [36.03/20] Open
def calldev(*mult)
@@ret = [nil]*@@size
@@exc = Array.new(@@size){[]}
@@params=mult
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method argsapi
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def argsapi call , *args
sbuf =[*args[0]]
hash = Hash===args[-1] && args[-1]
rt = args[2] ||
( call[/bcast|scatter|scatterv/] && hash && hash[:from]) ||
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method base_scatterv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def base_scatterv scon , sdis , sbuf , rbuf , root , comm
Method scatterv_lc
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scatterv_lc scon , sdis , sbuf , rbuf , root , comm
Method scatterv_tx
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scatterv_tx scon , sdis , sbuf , root , comm
Method base_scan
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def base_scan op, sbuf , rbuf , rt , comm
Method base_reduce_scatter
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def base_reduce_scatter op, sbuf , rbuf , rt , comm
Method base_reduce
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def base_reduce op, sbuf , rbuf , rt , comm
Method base_allreduce
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def base_allreduce op, sbuf , rbuf , rt , comm
Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [6/5] Open
def base_scatterv scon , sdis , sbuf , rbuf , root , comm
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for methods with too many parameters. The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count.
Method calldev
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calldev(*mult)
@@ret = [nil]*@@size
@@exc = Array.new(@@size){[]}
@@params=mult
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [6/5] Open
def scatterv_lc scon , sdis , sbuf , rbuf , root , comm
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for methods with too many parameters. The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count.
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
rt = args[2] ||
( call[/bcast|scatter|scatterv/] && hash && hash[:from]) ||
(!call[/bcast|scatter|scatterv/] && hash && hash[:to]) ||
( call[/allgather/] && all) ||
root
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
comm = args[3] ||
( call[/bcast|scatter|scatterv/] && hash && hash[:to]) ||
(!call[/bcast|scatter|scatterv/] && hash && hash[:from]) ||
( call[/sendrecv/] && root) ||
all
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 33.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76