Sign upLogin

metanorma/isodoc

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 81 of 81 total issues

Class PresentationXMLConvert has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class PresentationXMLConvert < ::IsoDoc::Convert
    def lower2cap(text)
      text.nil? and return text
      x = Nokogiri::XML("<a>#{text}</a>")
      firsttext = x.at(".//text()[string-length(normalize-space(.))>0]") or return text
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/block.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

    Method parse has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

          def parse(node, out)
        if node.text? then text_parse(node, out)
        else
          case node.name
          when "em" then em_parse(node, out)
    Severity: Major
    Found in lib/isodoc/function/to_word_html.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

      Class PresentationXMLConvert has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        class PresentationXMLConvert < ::IsoDoc::Convert
    def designation(docxml)
      docxml.xpath(ns("//term")).each { |t| merge_second_preferred(t) }
      docxml.xpath(ns("//preferred | //admitted | //deprecates"))
        .each { |p| designation1(p) }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/terms.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

        Class PresentationXMLConvert has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          class PresentationXMLConvert < ::IsoDoc::Convert
    def non_locality_elems(node)
      node.children.reject do |c|
        %w{locality localityStack location}.include? c.name
      end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/inline.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

          Class PresentationXMLConvert has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            class PresentationXMLConvert < ::IsoDoc::Convert
    def references(docxml)
      bibliography_bibitem_number(docxml)
      renderings = references_render(docxml)
      docxml.xpath(ns("//references/bibitem")).each do |x|
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/refs.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

            Class PresentationXMLConvert has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              class PresentationXMLConvert < ::IsoDoc::Convert
    SVG = { "m" => "http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" }.freeze

    def figure(docxml)
      docxml.xpath("//m:svg", SVG).each { |f| svg_wrap(f) }
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/image.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

              Class PresentationXMLConvert has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                class PresentationXMLConvert < ::IsoDoc::Convert
    def enable_indexsect
      false
    end
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/index.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

                File to_word_html.rb has 254 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                require "fileutils"
require "pathname"

module IsoDoc
  module Function
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/isodoc/function/to_word_html.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

                  Method top_element_render has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def top_element_render(e, out)
        case e.name
        when "abstract" then abstract e, out
        when "foreword" then foreword e, out
        when "introduction" then introduction e, out
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/function/to_word_html.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def insert_comment_cont(from, upto, target)
        # includes_to = from.at(".//*[@id='#{upto}']")
        while !from.nil? && from["id"] != upto
          following = from.xpath("./following::*")
          (from = following.shift) && incl_to = from.at(".//*[@id='#{upto}']")
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/isodoc/word_function/comments.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                  lib/isodoc/html_function/comments.rb on lines 97..106

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 57.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def insert_comment_cont(from, upto, target)
        # includes_to = from.at(".//*[@id='#{upto}']")
        while !from.nil? && from["id"] != upto
          following = from.xpath("./following::*")
          (from = following.shift) && incl_to = from.at(".//*[@id='#{upto}']")
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/isodoc/html_function/comments.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                  lib/isodoc/word_function/comments.rb on lines 105..114

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 57.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Method new_subseq_increment1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def new_subseq_increment1(node)
        /^(?<b>.*?)(?<n>\d*)(?<a>[a-zA-Z]*)$/ =~ node["number"]
        if !n.empty? || !a.empty?
          @letter_override = @letter = a unless a.empty?
          @number_override = @num = n.to_i unless n.empty?
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/xref/xref_counter.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def get_comments_from_text(docxml, link_order)
        comments = []
        docxml.xpath("//div[@style='mso-element:comment']").each do |c|
          next unless c["id"] && !link_order[c["id"]].nil?
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/isodoc/html_function/comments.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                  lib/isodoc/word_function/comments.rb on lines 125..132

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 50.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def get_comments_from_text(docxml, link_order)
        comments = []
        docxml.xpath("//div[@style='mso-element:comment']").each do |c|
          next unless c["id"] && !link_order[c["id"]].nil?
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/isodoc/word_function/comments.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                  lib/isodoc/html_function/comments.rb on lines 117..124

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 50.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Method make_tr_attr has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def make_tr_attr(cell, row, totalrows, header, bordered)
        style = cell.name == "th" ? "font-weight:bold;" : ""
        cell["align"] and style += "text-align:#{cell['align']};"
        cell["valign"] and style += "vertical-align:#{cell['valign']};"
        rowmax = cell["rowspan"] ? row + cell["rowspan"].to_i - 1 : row
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/function/table.rb - About 55 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Method norm_ref has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def norm_ref(node, out)
        node["hidden"] != "true" or return
        out.div do |div|
          clause_name(node, node.at(ns("./fmt-title")), div, nil)
          if node.name == "clause"
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/function/references.rb - About 55 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Method scss_fontheader has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      def scss_fontheader(is_html_css)
      b = options[:bodyfont] || "Arial"
      h = options[:headerfont] || "Arial"
      m = options[:monospacefont] || "Courier New"
      ns = options[:normalfontsize] || (is_html_css ? "1.0em" : "12.0pt")
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/css.rb - About 55 mins to fix

                  Cognitive Complexity

                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                  Further reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def comment_attributes(docxml, x)
        fromlink = docxml.at("//*[@id='#{x['from']}']")
        return(nil) if fromlink.nil?

        tolink = docxml.at("//*[@id='#{x['to']}']") || fromlink
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/html_function/comments.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                  lib/isodoc/word_function/comments.rb on lines 81..87

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 43.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def comment_attributes(docxml, span)
        fromlink = docxml.at("//*[@id='#{span['from']}']")
        return(nil) if fromlink.nil?

        tolink = docxml.at("//*[@id='#{span['to']}']") || fromlink
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/word_function/comments.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                  lib/isodoc/html_function/comments.rb on lines 79..85

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 43.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                        def abstract(clause, out)
        page_break(out)
        out.div **attr_code(id: clause["id"]) do |s|
          clause_name(clause, clause.at(ns("./fmt-title")), s,
                      { class: "AbstractTitle" })
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/isodoc/function/section.rb and 1 other location - About 45 mins to fix
                  lib/isodoc/function/section.rb on lines 99..104

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 40.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Severity
                  Category
                  Status
                  Source
                  Language