metanorma/isodoc

View on GitHub

Showing 70 of 112 total issues

Method id_ancestor has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def id_ancestor(node)
        parent = nil
        node.ancestors.each do |a|
          (a["id"] && (parent = a) && @anchors.dig(a["id"], :xref)) or next
          break
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/xref/xref_gen.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method localize_maths has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def localize_maths(node, locale)
      node.xpath(".//m:mn", MATHML).each do |x|
        num = BigDecimal(x.text)
        precision = /\./.match?(x.text) ? x.text.sub(/^.*\./, "").size : 0
        x.children = localized_number(num, locale, precision)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/presentation_function/math.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method admonition_parse has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def admonition_parse(node, out)
        type = node["type"]
        name = admonition_name(node, type)
        out.div **admonition_attrs(node) do |t|
          admonition_name_parse(node, t, name) if name
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/function/blocks_example_note.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method boilerplate has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def boilerplate(node, out)
        @bare and return
        boilerplate = node.at(ns("//boilerplate")) or return
        out.div class: "authority" do |s|
          boilerplate.children.each do |n|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/function/to_word_html.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method sequence_increment has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def sequence_increment(node)
        if node["branch-number"]
          @prefix_override = node["branch-number"]
        elsif node["number"]
          @base = @letter_override = @number_override = ""
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/xref/xref_counter.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method print has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def print
        @unnumbered and return nil
        @prefix_override and return @prefix_override
        num = @number_override || @num
        out = @style == :roman && !num.nil? ? RomanNumerals.to_roman(num) : num
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/xref/xref_counter.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method para_attrs has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def para_attrs(node)
        attrs = { class: para_class(node), id: node["id"], style: "" }
        unless node["align"].nil?
          attrs[:align] = node["align"] unless node["align"] == "justify"
          attrs[:style] += "text-align:#{node['align']};"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/word_function/body.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method agency1 has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def agency1(xml)
      agency = ""
      publisher = []
      xml.xpath(ns("//bibdata/contributor[xmlns:role/@type = 'publisher']/" \
                   "organization")).each do |org|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/metadata_contributor.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method header_strip_elem? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def header_strip_elem?(elem)
        elem.name == "img" ||
          (elem.name == "span" && elem["class"] == "MsoCommentReference") ||
          (elem.name == "a" && elem["class"] == "FootnoteRef") ||
          (elem.name == "span" && elem["style"]&.include?("mso-bookmark"))
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/function/utils.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method ol_type has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def ol_type(list, depth)
        return list["type"].to_sym if list["type"]
        return :arabic if [2, 7].include? depth
        return :alphabet if [1, 6].include? depth
        return :alphabet_upper if [4, 9].include? depth
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/isodoc/xref/xref_counter.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language