Showing 43 of 43 total issues
Class WordConvert
has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WordConvert < IsoDoc::WordConvert
def initialize(options)
@libdir = File.dirname(__FILE__)
super
init_dis(options)
Class PresentationXMLConvert
has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class PresentationXMLConvert < IsoDoc::PresentationXMLConvert
def convert_i18n_init(docxml)
super
update_i18n(docxml)
end
Class Metadata
has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Metadata < IsoDoc::Metadata
def initialize(lang, script, locale, i18n)
super
DATETYPES.each { |w| @metadata["#{w.gsub(/-/, '_')}date".to_sym] = nil }
set(:obsoletes, nil)
Class Converter
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Converter < Standoc::Converter
def extract_text(node)
node.nil? and return ""
node1 = Nokogiri::XML.fragment(node.to_s)
node1.xpath(".//link | .//locality | .//localityStack | .//stem")
Class WordDISConvert
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class WordDISConvert < WordConvert
STYLESMAP = {
AltTerms: "AdmittedTerm",
TableFootnote: "Tablefootnote",
formula: "Formula",
Class Xref
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Xref < IsoDoc::Xref
attr_accessor :anchors_previous, :anchors
def clause_order_main(docxml)
if @klass.amd?(docxml)
Method title
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def title(isoxml, _out)
lang = case @lang
when "fr", "ru" then @lang
else "en"
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method subtitle
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def subtitle(isoxml, _out)
lang = @lang == "en" ? "fr" : "en"
tp = title_parts(isoxml, lang)
tn = title_nums(isoxml)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def output(isodoc_node, inname, outname, format, options = {})
options_preprocess(options)
case format
when :html
IsoDoc::Iso::HtmlConvert.new(options)
Method see_xrefs_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def see_xrefs_validate(root)
@lang == "en" or return
root.xpath("//xref").each do |t|
preceding = t.at("./preceding-sibling::text()[last()]")
next unless !preceding.nil? &&
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method status_abbrev
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def status_abbrev(stage, _substage, iter, draft, doctype)
return "" unless stage
if %w(technical-report technical-specification).include?(doctype)
stage = "DTS" if stage == "DIS"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method see_erefs_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def see_erefs_validate(root)
@lang == "en" or return
root.xpath("//eref").each do |t|
prec = t.at("./preceding-sibling::text()[last()]")
!prec.nil? && /\b(see|refer to)\p{Zs}*\Z/mi.match(prec) or next
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{ intro: isoxml.at(ns("//bibdata/title[@type='title-intro' and " \
"@language='#{lang}']")),
main: isoxml.at(ns("//bibdata/title[@type='title-main' and " \
"@language='#{lang}']")),
part: isoxml.at(ns("//bibdata/title[@type='title-part' and " \
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
{ part: isoxml.at(ns("#{prefix}/@part")),
subpart: isoxml.at(ns("#{prefix}/@subpart")),
amd: isoxml.at(ns("#{prefix}/@amendment")),
add: isoxml.at(ns("#{prefix}/@addendum")),
corr: isoxml.at(ns("#{prefix}/@corrigendum")) }
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method default_fonts
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def default_fonts(options)
{
bodyfont: (if options[:script] == "Hans"
'"Source Han Sans",serif'
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method onlychild_clause_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def onlychild_clause_validate(root)
root.xpath(Standoc::Utils::SUBCLAUSE_XPATH).each do |c|
next unless c.xpath("../clause").size == 1
title = c.at("./title")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method status_abbrev
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def status_abbrev(stage, _substage, iter, draft, doctype)
Method disjunct_error
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def disjunct_error(img, cond1, cond2, msg1, msg2)
Method output
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def output(isodoc_node, inname, outname, format, options = {})
Method term_hash_init
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def term_hash_init(hash, term, term2, term3, label)