Showing 38 of 49 total issues
Method style_two_regex_not_prev
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_two_regex_not_prev(n, text, regex, re_prev, warning)
Method disjunct_error
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def disjunct_error(img, cond1, cond2, msg1, msg2)
Method output
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def output(isodoc_node, inname, outname, format, options={})
Method termdef_warn
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def termdef_warn(text, regex, elem, term, msg)
Method xref_init
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def xref_init(lang, script, _klass, i18n, options)
Method term_hash_init
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def term_hash_init(hash, term, term2, term3, label)
Method clause_etc1
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clause_etc1(clause, out, num)
out.div **attr_code(
id: clause["id"],
class: clause.name == "definitions" ? "Symbols" : nil,
) do |div|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method style_two_regex_not_prev
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_two_regex_not_prev(n, text, regex, re_prev, warning)
return if text.nil?
arr = Tokenizer::WhitespaceTokenizer.new.tokenize(text)
arr.each_index do |i|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return 3 if bib.at("./docidentifier[@type]" \
Method style_list_iso
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def style_list_iso(elem, level, listtype, idx)
return idx if elem.at(".//ol | .//ul") && !elem.at("./p")
idx += 1
ol = elem.xpath("./ancestor::ol")&.last
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method image_name_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def image_name_validate(xmldoc)
prefix = image_name_prefix(xmldoc) or return
xmldoc.xpath("//image").each do |i|
next if i["src"].start_with?("data:")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method pub_class
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pub_class(bib)
return 1 if bib.at("#{PUBLISHER}[abbreviation = 'ISO']")
return 1 if bib.at("#{PUBLISHER}[name = 'International Organization " \
"for Standardization']")
return 2 if bib.at("#{PUBLISHER}[abbreviation = 'IEC']")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method isosubgroup_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def isosubgroup_validate(root)
root.xpath("//technical-committee/@type").each do |t|
unless %w{TC PC JTC JPC}.include? t.text
@log.add("Document Attributes", nil,
"invalid technical committee type #{t}")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method example_continued_style
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def example_continued_style(docxml)
docxml.xpath("//div[@class = 'Example']").each do |d|
d.xpath("./p").each_with_index do |p, i|
p["class"] && p["class"] != "Example" and next
p["class"] = (i.zero? ? "Example" : "Examplecontinued")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method vocab_terms_titles_validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def vocab_terms_titles_validate(root)
terms = root.xpath("//sections/terms | //sections/clause[.//terms]")
if terms.size == 1
((t = terms.first.at("./title")) && (t&.text == @i18n.termsdef)) or
@log.add("Style", terms.first,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ol_depth
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ol_depth(node)
depth = node.ancestors(@iso_class ? "ol" : "ul, ol").size + 1
type = :alphabet
type = :arabic if [2, 7].include? depth
type = :roman if [3, 8].include? depth
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method note_continued_style
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def note_continued_style(docxml)
docxml.xpath("//div[@class = 'Note']").each do |d|
d.xpath("./p").each_with_index do |p, i|
p["class"] && p["class"] != "Note" and next
p["class"] = (i.zero? ? "Note" : "Notecontinued")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sort_biblio_key
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sort_biblio_key(bib)
pubclass = pub_class(bib)
num = bib.at("./docnumber")&.text
id = bib.at("./docidentifier[@primary]") ||
bib.at("./docidentifier[not(#{skip_docid} or @type = 'metanorma')]")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"